248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9973023)
1. Real-time measurement of radiation exposure to patients during diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous interventional procedures.
Cusma JT; Bell MR; Wondrow MA; Taubel JP; Holmes DR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Feb; 33(2):427-35. PubMed ID: 9973023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the use of new intracoronary interventional devices prolong radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory?
Federman J; Bell MR; Wondrow MA; Grill DE; Holmes DR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Feb; 23(2):347-51. PubMed ID: 8294685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient radiation dose reduction using an X-ray imaging noise reduction technology for cardiac angiography and intervention.
Nakamura S; Kobayashi T; Funatsu A; Okada T; Mauti M; Waizumi Y; Yamada S
Heart Vessels; 2016 May; 31(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 25840815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation risk to patients from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
Pattee PL; Johns PC; Chambers RJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Oct; 22(4):1044-51. PubMed ID: 8409039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation dose reduction in the cardiac catheterization laboratory utilizing a novel protocol.
Wassef AW; Hiebert B; Ravandi A; Ducas J; Minhas K; Vo M; Kass M; Parmar G; Hussain F
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):550-7. PubMed ID: 24746655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient dose values in a dedicated Greek cardiac centre.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Vano E; Faulkner K; Giannouleas J; Padovani R; Kyrozi E; Koutelou M; Vardalaki E; Neofotistou V
Br J Radiol; 2003 Oct; 76(910):726-30. PubMed ID: 14512333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of the implementation of a simple radiation reduction protocol in the catheterization laboratory.
Jurado-Román A; Sánchez-Pérez I; Lozano Ruíz-Poveda F; López-Lluva MT; Pinilla-Echeverri N; Moreno Arciniegas A; Agudo-Quilez P; Gil Agudo A
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016; 17(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 27085219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions.
Abdelaal E; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Arsenault J; Rimac G; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Larose E; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Allende R; Ribeiro H; Costerousse O; Mongrain R; Bertrand OF;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):567-74. PubMed ID: 24746649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the radiation dose in a cardiac IVR X-ray system.
Inaba Y; Chida K; Shirotori K; Shimura H; Yanagawa I; Zuguchi M; Takahashi S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jan; 143(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21081517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized comparison between rotational and standard coronary angiography.
Rigattieri S; Ghini AS; Silvestri P; Tommasino A; Ferraiuolo G; Palamara A; Loschiavo P
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2005 Feb; 53(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15788975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Balloon angioplasty of chronic total coronary artery occlusions: what does it cost in radiation exposure, time, and materials?
Bell MR; Berger PB; Menke KK; Holmes DR
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 Jan; 25(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 1555221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fluoroscopy pulse rate reduction during diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: An evaluation of radiation dose, procedure complications and outcomes.
Hansen JW; Foy A; Schmidt T; Ghahramani M; Chambers CE
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 89(4):665-670. PubMed ID: 27121130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Real-time measurement of skin radiation during cardiac catheterization.
Hwang E; Gaxiola E; Vlietstra RE; Brenner A; Ebersole D; Browne K
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1998 Apr; 43(4):367-70; discussion 371. PubMed ID: 9554759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Impact of Novel X-Ray Systems and X-Ray System Optimization on Patient Radiation Dose Administered During Cardiac Catheterization.
Vemmou E; Nikolakopoulos I; Xenogiannis I; Megaly M; Omer MA; Stanberry L; Garberich R; Rangan BV; Baran KW; Gössl M; Sorajja P; Chavez I; Mooney M; Traverse J; Wang Y; Garcia S; Poulose A; Burke MN; Brilakis ES
J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 32(6):218-221. PubMed ID: 32385193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship of beam angulation and radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Agarwal S; Parashar A; Bajaj NS; Khan I; Ahmad I; Heupler FA; Bunte M; Modi DK; Tuzcu EM; Kapadia SR
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):558-66. PubMed ID: 24746652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does digital acquisition reduce patients' skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures? An experimental study.
Chida K; Saito H; Zuguchi M; Shirotori K; Kumagai S; Nakayama H; Matsubara K; Kohzuki M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Oct; 183(4):1111-4. PubMed ID: 15385315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation exposure to patients undergoing diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization procedures.
Bakalyar DM; Castellani MD; Safian RD
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1997 Oct; 42(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 9328690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation exposure and efficacy of exposure-reduction techniques during cardiac catheterization in children.
Schueler BA; Julsrud PR; Gray JE; Stears JG; Wu KY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):173-7. PubMed ID: 8273659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors influencing fluoroscopy time and dose-area product values during ad hoc one-vessel percutaneous coronary angioplasty.
Larrazet F; Dibie A; Philippe F; Palau R; Klausz R; Laborde F
Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):473-7. PubMed ID: 12857707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Radiation Dose Reduction Technology to Improve Patient Safety During Cardiac Catheterization Interventions.
Bracken JA; Mauti M; Kim MS; Messenger JC; Carroll JD
J Interv Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 28(5):493-7. PubMed ID: 26381865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
