These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9973303)

  • 1. Power of association and linkage tests when the disease alleles are unobserved.
    Tu IP; Whittemore AS
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Feb; 64(2):641-9. PubMed ID: 9973303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exact transmission-disequilibrium tests with multiallelic markers.
    Cleves MA; Olson JM; Jacobs KB
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 9271708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The expected power of genome-wide linkage disequilibrium testing using single nucleotide polymorphism markers for detecting a low-frequency disease variant.
    Ohashi J; Tokunaga K
    Ann Hum Genet; 2002 Jul; 66(Pt 4):297-306. PubMed ID: 12418970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The affected-/discordant-sib-pair design can guarantee validity of multipoint model-free linkage analysis of incomplete pedigrees when there is marker-marker disequilibrium.
    Xing C; Sinha R; Xing G; Lu Q; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2006 Aug; 79(2):396-401. PubMed ID: 16826532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses.
    Thomson G; Motro U
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association tests using unaffected-sibling versus pseudo-sibling controls.
    Siegmund KD; Gauderman WJ; Thomas DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S731-6. PubMed ID: 10597522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power studies for the transmission/disequilibrium tests with multiple alleles.
    Kaplan NL; Martin ER; Weir BS
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Mar; 60(3):691-702. PubMed ID: 9042930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Joint modeling of linkage and association: identifying SNPs responsible for a linkage signal.
    Li M; Boehnke M; Abecasis GR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Jun; 76(6):934-49. PubMed ID: 15877278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detecting linkage disequilibrium between a polymorphic marker locus and a trait locus in natural populations.
    Luo ZW
    Heredity (Edinb); 1998 Feb; 80 ( Pt 2)():198-208. PubMed ID: 9537842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Joint linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping in natural populations.
    Wu R; Zeng ZB
    Genetics; 2001 Feb; 157(2):899-909. PubMed ID: 11157006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A discordant-sibship test for disequilibrium and linkage: no need for parental data.
    Horvath S; Laird NM
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Dec; 63(6):1886-97. PubMed ID: 9837840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linkage analysis versus association analysis: distinguishing between two models that explain disease-marker associations.
    Hodge SE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Aug; 53(2):367-84. PubMed ID: 8328455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The power to detect linkage disequilibrium with quantitative traits in selected samples.
    Abecasis GR; Cookson WO; Cardon LR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Jun; 68(6):1463-74. PubMed ID: 11349228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The loss of statistical power to distinguish populations when certain samples are ambiguous.
    O'Hely M; Slatkin M
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 Sep; 64(2):177-92. PubMed ID: 12948679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A note on the optimal measure of allelic association.
    Shete S
    Ann Hum Genet; 2003 Mar; 67(Pt 2):189-91. PubMed ID: 12675694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of marker associations with a dominant disease gene in genetically complex and heterogeneous diseases.
    Gershon ES; Martinez M; Goldin L; Gelernter J; Silver J
    Am J Hum Genet; 1989 Oct; 45(4):578-85. PubMed ID: 2491015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of allelic heterogeneity on the power of the transmission disequilibrium test.
    Slager SL; Huang J; Vieland VJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 10642427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linkage analysis of a complex disease through use of admixed populations.
    Zhu X; Cooper RS; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Jun; 74(6):1136-53. PubMed ID: 15131754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.