218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9973876)
1. Determination of the effect of lift characteristics on dynamic performance profiles during manual materials handling tasks.
Khalaf KA; Parnianpour M; Sparto PJ; Barin K
Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):126-45. PubMed ID: 9973876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feature extraction and quantification of the variability of dynamic performance profiles due to the different sagittal lift characteristics.
Khalaf KA; Parnianpour M; Sparto PJ; Barin K
IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 1999 Sep; 7(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 10498374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feature extraction and modeling of the variability of performance in terms of biomechanical motion patterns during MMH tasks.
Khalaf KA; Parnianpour M; Wade L
Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 33():35-40. PubMed ID: 9731332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Workplace design guidelines for asymptomatic vs. low-back-injured workers.
Ferguson SA; Marras WS; Burr D
Appl Ergon; 2005 Jan; 36(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 15627426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of a sloped ground surface on trunk kinematics and L5/S1 moment during lifting.
Shin G; Mirka G
Ergonomics; 2004 May; 47(6):646-59. PubMed ID: 15204292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Muscle fatigue and fatigue-related biomechanical changes during a cyclic lifting task.
Bonato P; Ebenbichler GR; Roy SH; Lehr S; Posch M; Kollmitzer J; Della Croce U
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1810-20. PubMed ID: 12923468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low-back stresses when learning to use a materials handling device.
Chaffin DB; Stump BS; Nussbaum MA; Baker G
Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):94-110. PubMed ID: 9973874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simulation of manual materials handling: biomechanial assessment under different lifting conditions.
Gündogdu O; Anderson KS; Parnianpour M
Technol Health Care; 2005; 13(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 15706064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences in motor recruitment and resulting kinematics between low back pain patients and asymptomatic participants during lifting exertions.
Ferguson SA; Marras WS; Burr DL; Davis KG; Gupta P
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Dec; 19(10):992-9. PubMed ID: 15531048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of adjusting working height and mechanizing of transport on physical work demands and local discomfort in construction work.
van der Molen HF; Grouwstra R; Kuijer PP; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
Ergonomics; 2004 Jun; 47(7):772-83. PubMed ID: 15204287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
Chaffin DB; Page GB
Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relation between spinal load factors and the high-risk probability of occupational low-back disorder.
Granata KP; Marras WS
Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1187-99. PubMed ID: 10503053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to lift a box that is too large to fit between the knees.
Kingma I; Faber GS; van Dieën JH
Ergonomics; 2010 Oct; 53(10):1228-38. PubMed ID: 20865606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiating lifting technique between those who develop low back pain and those who do not.
Wrigley AT; Albert WJ; Deluzio KJ; Stevenson JM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Mar; 20(3):254-63. PubMed ID: 15698697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling.
Jäger M; Luttmann A
Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):783-805. PubMed ID: 1633789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The development of a model to predict the effects of worker and task factors on foot placements in manual material handling tasks.
Wagner DW; Reed MP; Chaffin DB
Ergonomics; 2010 Nov; 53(11):1368-84. PubMed ID: 20967659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lifting characteristics of functionally limited elders.
Puniello MS; McGibbon CA; Krebs DE
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2000; 37(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 10917266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
Ciriello VM
Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in the surface EMG signal and the biomechanics of motion during a repetitive lifting task.
Bonato P; Boissy P; Della Croce U; Roy SH
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2002 Mar; 10(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 12173738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methods for assessing the physical demands of manual lifting: a review and case study from warehousing.
Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Baron S
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):871-81. PubMed ID: 9866167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
