These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 998608)

  • 1. Stratification by a multivariate confounder score.
    Miettinen OS
    Am J Epidemiol; 1976 Dec; 104(6):609-20. PubMed ID: 998608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asymmetric stratification. An outline for an efficient method for controlling confounding in cohort studies.
    Cook EF; Goldman L
    Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Mar; 127(3):626-39. PubMed ID: 3341363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of tests of significance based on stratification by a multivariate confounder score or by a propensity score.
    Cook EF; Goldman L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1989; 42(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 2723692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confounding and misclassification.
    Greenland S; Robins JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 1985 Sep; 122(3):495-506. PubMed ID: 4025298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of misclassification in the presence of covariates.
    Greenland S
    Am J Epidemiol; 1980 Oct; 112(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 7424903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Cluster analysis applied in the epidemiological stratification analysis].
    Zhang JK; Hu YL; Hu CF; Luo YX; Lin WS; Wu CP
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Jul; 24(7):615-7. PubMed ID: 12975022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confounding: essence and detection.
    Miettinen OS; Cook EF
    Am J Epidemiol; 1981 Oct; 114(4):593-603. PubMed ID: 7304589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of dual or multiple reports in epidemiologic studies.
    Marshall JR
    Stat Med; 1989 Sep; 8(9):1041-9; discussion 1071-3. PubMed ID: 2799130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Causality and confounding in epidemiology].
    Stang A
    Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Dec; 73(12):884-7. PubMed ID: 22193897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confounding in epidemiologic studies: the adequacy of the control group as a measure of confounding.
    Wickramaratne PJ; Holford TR
    Biometrics; 1987 Dec; 43(4):751-65. PubMed ID: 3427162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multivariate contingency tables and the analysis of exchangeability.
    Ten Have TR; Becker MP
    Biometrics; 1995 Sep; 51(3):1001-16. PubMed ID: 7548687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controlling for confounding factors and revealing their interactions in genetic association meta-analyses: a computing method and application for stratification analyses.
    Lin S; Liu X; Yao B; Huang Z
    Oncotarget; 2018 Feb; 9(15):12125-12136. PubMed ID: 29552297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Application of directed acyclic graphs in control of confounding].
    Xiang R; Dai WJ; Xiong Y; Wu X; Yang YF; Wang L; Dai ZH; Li J; Liu AZ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1035-8. PubMed ID: 27453119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choice of column scores for testing independence in ordered 2 X K contingency tables.
    Graubard BI; Korn EL
    Biometrics; 1987 Jun; 43(2):471-6. PubMed ID: 3607207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of propensity scores, disease risk scores, and regression in confounder adjustment for the safety of emerging treatment with group sequential monitoring.
    Xu S; Shetterly S; Cook AJ; Raebel MA; Goonesekera S; Shoaibi A; Roy J; Fireman B
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Apr; 25(4):453-61. PubMed ID: 26875591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the epidemiologic notion of confounding and confounder identification.
    Nurminen M
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1997 Feb; 23(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 9098915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The score test for independence in R x C contingency tables with missing data.
    Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):751-62. PubMed ID: 8672711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using generalized additive models to reduce residual confounding.
    Benedetti A; Abrahamowicz M
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(24):3781-801. PubMed ID: 15580601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of longitudinal data with unmeasured confounders.
    Palta M; Yao TJ
    Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1355-69. PubMed ID: 1786323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Which Propensity Score Method Best Reduces Confounder Imbalance? An Example From a Retrospective Evaluation of a Childhood Obesity Intervention.
    Schroeder K; Jia H; Smaldone A
    Nurs Res; 2016; 65(6):465-474. PubMed ID: 27801717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.