These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 998608)

  • 21. Tests of the null hypothesis in case-control studies.
    Lustbader ED; Moolgavkar SH; Venzon DJ
    Biometrics; 1984 Dec; 40(4):1017-24. PubMed ID: 6534405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new criterion for confounder selection? Neither a confounder nor science.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Oct; 19(5):984-6. PubMed ID: 23136840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incorporating prior information into the analysis of contingency tables.
    Knuiman MW; Speed TP
    Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1061-71. PubMed ID: 3233246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stratification for confounding--part 1: the Mantel-Haenszel formula.
    Tripepi G; Jager KJ; Dekker FW; Zoccali C
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2010; 116(4):c317-21. PubMed ID: 20664286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Risk factor adjustment in marginal structural model estimation of optimal treatment regimes.
    Moodie EE
    Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):774-88. PubMed ID: 19816876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Practical epidemiology and biostatistics in research epidemiologic glossary.
    Quresh AF; Lobo MA; Inam SN
    J Pak Med Assoc; 1993 Nov; 43(11):245-7. PubMed ID: 8114265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multivariate methods in ophthalmology with application to other paired-data situations.
    Rosner B
    Biometrics; 1984 Dec; 40(4):1025-35. PubMed ID: 6534406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Testing hypotheses in case-control studies--equivalence of Mantel-Haenszel statistics and logit score tests.
    Day NE; Byar DP
    Biometrics; 1979 Sep; 35(3):623-30. PubMed ID: 497345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implications of M bias in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.
    Liu W; Brookhart MA; Schneeweiss S; Mi X; Setoguchi S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 176(10):938-48. PubMed ID: 23100247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2 x 2 contingency table: an overview of Fisher's exact test and Yates' correction for continuity.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    J Biopharm Stat; 1995 Mar; 5(1):43-70. PubMed ID: 7613560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The "Dry-Run" Analysis: A Method for Evaluating Risk Scores for Confounding Control.
    Wyss R; Hansen BB; Ellis AR; Gagne JJ; Desai RJ; Glynn RJ; Stürmer T
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 May; 185(9):842-852. PubMed ID: 28338910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Approaches to Teaching Biometry and Epidemiology at Two Veterinary Schools in Germany.
    Zeimet R; Kreienbrock L; Doherr MG
    J Vet Med Educ; 2016; 43(4):332-343. PubMed ID: 27404550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Weaknesses of goodness-of-fit tests for evaluating propensity score models: the case of the omitted confounder.
    Weitzen S; Lapane KL; Toledano AY; Hume AL; Mor V
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Apr; 14(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15386700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Identification of confounder in epidemiologic data contaminated by measurement error in covariates.
    Lee PH; Burstyn I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 May; 16():54. PubMed ID: 27193095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
    Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The analysis of dependence in cross-classifications having ordered categories, using log-linear models for frequencies and log-linear models for odds.
    Goodman LA
    Biometrics; 1983 Mar; 39(1):149-60. PubMed ID: 6871344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Classification of multidimensional contingency tables].
    Victor N
    Biometrics; 1972 Jun; 28(2):427-41. PubMed ID: 5037864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A robust approach to t linear mixed models applied to multiple sclerosis data.
    Lin TI; Lee JC
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(8):1397-412. PubMed ID: 16220509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Decomposition and model selection for large contingency tables.
    Dahinden C; Kalisch M; Bühlmann P
    Biom J; 2010 Apr; 52(2):233-52. PubMed ID: 20213739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Propensity-score-based Fine Stratification Approach for Confounding Adjustment When Exposure Is Infrequent.
    Desai RJ; Rothman KJ; Bateman BT; Hernandez-Diaz S; Huybrechts KF
    Epidemiology; 2017 Mar; 28(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 27922533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.