149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9986831)
1. Head-to-head evaluation of five chlamydia tests relative to a quality-assured culture standard.
Newhall WJ; Johnson RE; DeLisle S; Fine D; Hadgu A; Matsuda B; Osmond D; Campbell J; Stamm WE
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Mar; 37(3):681-5. PubMed ID: 9986831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.
Ostergaard L; Møller JK
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.
Clarke LM; Sierra MF; Daidone BJ; Lopez N; Covino JM; McCormack WM
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):968-71. PubMed ID: 7681852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Confirmation of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay for chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test.
Beebe JL; Masters H; Jungkind D; Heltzel DM; Weinberg A
Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 8946630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.
Lefebvre J; Laperrière H; Rousseau H; Massé R
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 26(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 3284899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women.
Olsen MA; Sambol AR; Bohnert VA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Biostar Chlamydia OIA assay with specimens from women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic.
Pate MS; Dixon PB; Hardy K; Crosby M; Hook EW
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Aug; 36(8):2183-6. PubMed ID: 9665987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 1-year evaluation of Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay with selective confirmation by direct fluorescent-antibody assay in a high-volume laboratory.
Chan EL; Brandt K; Horsman GB
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2208-11. PubMed ID: 7814548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of nonculture-dependent methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant women.
Baselski VS; McNeeley SG; Ryan G; Robison M
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jul; 70(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 3299179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the PACE 2 assay, two amplification assays, and Clearview EIA for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in female endocervical and urine specimens.
Lauderdale TL; Landers L; Thorneycroft I; Chapin K
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jul; 37(7):2223-9. PubMed ID: 10364589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by enzyme immunoassay, culture, and three nucleic acid amplification tests.
Van Dyck E; Ieven M; Pattyn S; Van Damme L; Laga M
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 May; 39(5):1751-6. PubMed ID: 11325985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a nonisotopic probe for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.
Woods GL; Young A; Scott JC; Blair TM; Johnson AM
J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Feb; 28(2):370-2. PubMed ID: 2179265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Kallested Pathfinder EIA, cytocentrifuged direct fluorescent antibody, and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
LeBar W; Schubiner H; Jemal C; Herschman B; Criswell K; Curtin N; Sherbeck M
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991; 14(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 2013206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.
Wu CH; Lee MF; Yin SC; Yang DM; Cheng SF
Sex Transm Dis; 1992; 19(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 1411833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis.
Warren R; Dwyer B; Plackett M; Pettit K; Rizvi N; Baker AM
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Jun; 31(6):1663-6. PubMed ID: 8315015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of patient characteristics on performance of an enzyme immunoassay for detecting cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
Magder LS; Klontz KC; Bush LH; Barnes RC
J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Apr; 28(4):781-4. PubMed ID: 2185264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of three immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from asymptomatic males.
Leonardi GP; Seitz M; Edstrom R; Cruz J; Costello P; Szabo K
J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Nov; 30(11):2793-6. PubMed ID: 1452648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme immunoassay versus culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Bäckman M; Rudén AK; Ringertz O; Sanström EG
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989 Sep; 8(9):778-82. PubMed ID: 2480238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Abbott Testpack Chlamydia for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in patients attending sexually transmitted diseases clinics.
Reichart CA; Gaydos CA; Brady WE; Quinn TC; Hook EW
Sex Transm Dis; 1990; 17(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 2247805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Confirmatory testing of Chlamydia trachomatis Syva enzyme immunoassay gray zone specimens by Syva direct fluorescent antibody test.
Beebe JL; Rau MP; Albrecht KD
Sex Transm Dis; 1993; 20(3):140-2. PubMed ID: 8511707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
