130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9987443)
1. Automation of primary screening for cervical cancer. Sooner or later?
Bartels PH; Vooijs GP
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 9987443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Automation in cervical cytology: whose cost and whose benefit?
Wain GV
Med J Aust; 1997 Nov; 167(9):460-1. PubMed ID: 9397056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality control in cervical cancer screening: Brazilian experience.
Collaço LM; de Noronha L; Bleggi-Torres LF; Pinheiro DL
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):694-6. PubMed ID: 16450916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated screening for cervical cancer: diagnostic decision procedures.
Bartels PH; Wied GL
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 9022719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence-based medicine--in real time. Comparing methods of cervical Ca screening.
Genova NJ
JAAPA; 2000 Jan; 13(1):55-6, 59-60, 63. PubMed ID: 11503224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Stanley F. Patten, Jr., M.D., Ph.D. and the development of an automated Papanicolaou smear screening system.
Lee JS; Nelson AC
Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):332-6. PubMed ID: 9438457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Colposcopy, cervical screening, and HPV. Preface.
Waxman AG
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):xv-xvi. PubMed ID: 19061813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A Groundbreaking Work Which Laid the Foundation for Mass Screening in Cervical Cytology in Japan.
Osamura RY
Acta Cytol; 2017; 61(4-5):299-304. PubMed ID: 28693014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Estimation of the recruitment rate in cytological screening for cancer of the uterine cervix].
Raymond L; Riotton G
Soz Praventivmed; 1977; 22(4):176-7. PubMed ID: 605679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical cancer patterns with automation-assisted and conventional cytological screening: a randomized study.
Anttila A; Pokhrel A; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Hakama M; Malila N; Nieminen P
Int J Cancer; 2011 Mar; 128(5):1204-12. PubMed ID: 20848590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Translational approaches to improving cervical screening.
Baldwin P; Laskey R; Coleman N
Nat Rev Cancer; 2003 Mar; 3(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 12612656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advances in cervical screening technology.
Stoler MH
Mod Pathol; 2000 Mar; 13(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 10757338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automation of the Papanicolaou smear: a technology assessment perspective.
Linder J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 9111119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The FocalPoint System: FocalPoint slide profiler and FocalPoint GS.
Kardos TF
Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):334-9. PubMed ID: 15549692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Computer-assisted cervical screening].
van Kemenade FJ; Beerman H
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2011; 155(18):A2998. PubMed ID: 21466727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic scanning for cervical smears.
Spriggs AI
J Clin Pathol Suppl Coll Pathol; 1969; 3():1-7. PubMed ID: 5272508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Results of a computer assisted screening program for gynecologic mass examinations (author's transl)].
Seidenschnur G; Neumann HG; Büttner HH; Bader G; Beust M
Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1977; 47(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 921483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scan-and-treat methodology using Azure A fast stain as a cost-effective cervical cancer screening alternative to visual inspection with acetic acid.
Guillaud M; Benedet JL; Follen M; Crain BT; MacAulay C
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S256-9. PubMed ID: 17825881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New cervical cancer screening techniques.
McNeeley SG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Oct; 189(4 Suppl):S40-1. PubMed ID: 14586319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A new age in Pap testing.
Byrnes EC
Adv Nurse Pract; 1998 Nov; 6(11):65-6, 92. PubMed ID: 9919063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
