116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9987446)
21. Endometrial cells and the AutoPap System for primary screening of cervicovaginal Pap smears.
Walts AE; Thomas P
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Oct; 27(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 12357502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Direct-to-vial use of the AutoCyte PREP liquid-based preparation for cervical-vaginal specimens in three European laboratories.
Vassilakos P; Saurel J; Rondez R
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 9987452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [The use of a computerised system in the reading of cytological cervicovaginals smears during programming of regional screening (one year of experience using the autopap system)].
Orlassino R; Fabbrini T; Gallo C; Vineis C
Pathologica; 2005 Apr; 97(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 16032952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Papnet-assisted cytological diagnosis intensifies the already marked variability among cytological laboratories.
Mudu P; Migliore G; Alderisio M; Morosini P; Douglas G; Navone R; Montanari G; Di Bonito L; Vitali A; Moretti D; Giovagnoli MR; Fulciniti F; Branca M;
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2002; 23(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 12094957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effectiveness of AutoPap system location-guided screening in the evaluation of cervical cytology smears.
Stevens MW; Milne AJ; Parkinson IH; Nespolon WW; Fazzalari NL; Arora N; Dodd TJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Aug; 31(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 15282720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Papnet-assisted and manual screening of cervical smears.
Losell K; Dejmek A
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Oct; 21(4):296-9. PubMed ID: 10495327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Performance of the AutoPap Primary Screening System in the detection of high-risk cases in cervicovaginal smears.
Alasio LM; Alphandery C; Grassi P; Ruggeri M; De Palo G; Pilotti S
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(5):704-8. PubMed ID: 11575647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effectiveness of automated cervical cytology rescreening using the AutoPap 300 QC System.
Stevens MW; Milne AJ; James KA; Brancheau D; Ellison D; Kuan L
Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Jun; 16(6):505-12. PubMed ID: 9181316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reliability of sparing Papanicolaou test conventional reading in cases reported as No Further Review at AutoPap-assisted cytological screening: survey of 30,658 cases with follow-up cytological screening.
Troni GM; Cariaggi MP; Bulgaresi P; Houssami N; Ciatto S
Cancer; 2007 Apr; 111(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 17330271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quality control of the autopap screening system employed as a primary screening device: rapid review of smears coded as no further review.
Bulgaresi P; Cariaggi MP; Troni GM; Ciatto S
Tumori; 2006; 92(4):276-8. PubMed ID: 17036515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A clinical trial of the AutoPap 300 QC system for quality control of cervicovaginal cytology in the clinical laboratory.
Colgan TJ; Patten SF; Lee JS
Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(6):1191-8. PubMed ID: 7483997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of cervical smears at King Hussein Medical Centre, Jordan, over three and a half years.
Malkawi SR; Abu Hazeem RM; Hajjat BM; Hajjiri FK
East Mediterr Health J; 2004; 10(4-5):676-9. PubMed ID: 16335662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. AutoPap system detection of infections and benign cellular changes: results from primary screener clinical trials.
Wilbur DC; Prey MU; Miller WM; Pawlick GF; Colgan TJ; Taylor DD
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Nov; 21(5):355-8. PubMed ID: 10527485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System.
Biscotti CV; Dawson AE; Dziura B; Galup L; Darragh T; Rahemtulla A; Wills-Frank L
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 15842055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of the AutoCyte SCREEN system in a clinical cytopathology laboratory.
Bishop JW; Cheuvront DA; Sims KL
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 10740595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.
Sherman ME; Schiffman M; Herrero R; Kelly D; Bratti C; Mango LJ; Alfaro M; Hutchinson ML; Mena F; Hildesheim A; Morales J; Greenberg MD; Balmaceda I; Lorincz AT
Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. AutoPap system performance in screening for low prevalence and small cell abnormalities.
Lee JS; Wilhelm P; Kuan L; Ellison DG; Lei X; Oh S; Patten SF
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 9022727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the CytoRich slide preparation process.
Laverty CR; Farnsworth A; Thurloe JK; Grieves A; Bowditch R
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Jun; 19(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 9196807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cervical cancer screening in a rural population of Zimbabwe.
Thistle PJ; Chirenje ZM
Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Sep; 43(9):246-51. PubMed ID: 9509642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
