These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9987448)

  • 1. Multicenter comparison of manual and automated screening of AutoCyte gynecologic preparations.
    Bishop JW; Kaufman RH; Taylor DA
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9987448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AutoCyte Interactive Screening System. Experience at a university hospital cytology laboratory.
    Howell LP; Belk T; Agdigos R; Davis R; Lowe J
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 9987451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the AutoCyte SCREEN system in a clinical cytopathology laboratory.
    Bishop JW; Cheuvront DA; Sims KL
    Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 10740595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct-to-vial use of the AutoCyte PREP liquid-based preparation for cervical-vaginal specimens in three European laboratories.
    Vassilakos P; Saurel J; Rondez R
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 9987452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does use of the AutoPap assisted primary screener improve cytologic diagnosis?
    Bibbo M; Hawthorne C; Zimmerman B
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9987445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PAPNET for cervical cytology screening. Experience in Greece.
    Veneti S; Papaefthimiou M; Symiakaki H; Ioannidou-Mouzaka L
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 9987447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results.
    Bishop JW; Bigner SH; Colgan TJ; Husain M; Howell LP; McIntosh KM; Taylor DA; Sadeghi MH
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 9479339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. AutoCyte Prep system vs. conventional cervical cytology. Comparison based on 2,156 cases.
    Minge L; Fleming M; VanGeem T; Bishop JW
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Mar; 45(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 10756493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AutoCyte SCREEN interactive automated primary cytology screening system. A preliminary evaluation.
    Takahashi M; Kimura M; Akagi A; Naitoh M
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):185-8. PubMed ID: 9479338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utility of residual AutoCyte cervical cytology samples for image analysis.
    Bishop JW; Cheuvront DA; Elston RJ
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 9987449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System.
    Biscotti CV; Dawson AE; Dziura B; Galup L; Darragh T; Rahemtulla A; Wills-Frank L
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 15842055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of the AutoPap primary screening system at Jefferson University Hospital.
    Bibbo M; Hawthorne C
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 9987446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Papnet-assisted cytological diagnosis intensifies the already marked variability among cytological laboratories.
    Mudu P; Migliore G; Alderisio M; Morosini P; Douglas G; Navone R; Montanari G; Di Bonito L; Vitali A; Moretti D; Giovagnoli MR; Fulciniti F; Branca M;
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2002; 23(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 12094957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of manual and automated methods of liquid-based cytology. A morphologic study.
    Alves VA; Bibbo M; Schmitt FC; Milanezi F; Longatto Filho A
    Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 15085750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: II. Prospective and archival sensitivity studies.
    Patten SF; Lee JS; Wilbur DC; Bonfiglio TA; Colgan TJ; Richart RM; Cramer H; Moinuddin S
    Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 9438459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The AutoCyte preparation system for gynecologic cytology.
    Howell LP; Davis RL; Belk TI; Agdigos R; Lowe J
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 9479336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determining the utility and effectiveness of the NeoPath AutoPap 300 QC System used routinely.
    Fetterman B; Pawlick G; Koo H; Hartinger J; Gilbert C; Connell S
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 9987444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct-to-vial experience with AutoCyte PREP in a small New England regional cytology practice.
    Marino JF; Fremont-Smith M
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Apr; 46(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 11354836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Liquid-based cervical-cell collection with brushes and wooden spatulas: a comparison of 100 conventional smears from high-risk women to liquid-fixed cytocentrifuge slides, demonstrating a cost-effective, alternative monolayer slide preparation method.
    Johnson T; Maksem JA; Belsheim BL; Roose EB; Klock LA; Eatwell L
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Feb; 22(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 10649517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears: cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy.
    O'Leary TJ; Tellado M; Buckner SB; Ali IS; Stevens A; Ollayos CW
    JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9438746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.