These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9987448)

  • 21. Semiautomated monolayer preparation of bronchial secretions using AutoCyte PREP.
    Motherby H; Nicklaus S; Berg A; Ohler S; Ross B; Sarbia M; Böcking A
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 9987450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Papnet-assisted, primary screening of cervico-vaginal smears.
    Duggan MA
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000; 21(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10726616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effectiveness of thin-layer preparations vs. conventional Pap smears in a blinded, split-sample study. Extended cytologic evaluation.
    Hessling JJ; Raso DS; Schiffer B; Callicott J; Husain M; Taylor D
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):880-6. PubMed ID: 11725731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preliminary assessment of the AutoCyte PREP. Direct-to-vial performance.
    Tench W
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):912-6. PubMed ID: 11127103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of computer-assisted and manual screening of cervical cytology.
    Lozano R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jan; 104(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 16959306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: I. A prospective intended use study.
    Patten SF; Lee JS; Wilbur DC; Bonfiglio TA; Colgan TJ; Richart RM; Cramer H; Moinuddin S
    Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):337-42. PubMed ID: 9438458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
    Lee JS; Kuan L; Oh S; Patten FW; Wilbur DC
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of automated primary screening on liquid-based, thin-layer preparations.
    Vassilakos P; Carrel S; Petignat P; Boulvain M; Campana A
    Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 11917575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Location-guided screening of liquid-based cervical cytology specimens: a potential improvement in accuracy and productivity is demonstrated in a preclinical feasibility trial.
    Wilbur DC; Parker EM; Foti JA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Sep; 118(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 12219782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Utility of the Thin Prep Imaging System® in the detection of squamous intraepithelial abnormalities on retrospective evaluation: can we trust the imager?
    Barroeta JE; Reilly ME; Steinhoff MM; Lawrence WD
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Feb; 40(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 22246928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improved quality-control detection of false-negative Pap smears using the Autopap 300 QC system.
    Marshall CJ; Rowe L; Bentz JS
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Mar; 20(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 10086244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.
    Wilbur DC; Prey MU; Miller WM; Pawlick GF; Colgan TJ
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9479343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Value of computer-assisted slide-screening system in ThinPrep cervical cytology].
    Yang J; Tao K; Yang H; Guo ZH; Hu YM; Tan ZY
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 42(9):609-12. PubMed ID: 24314247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the CytoRich system with conventional cervical cytology. Preliminary data on 2,032 cases from a clinical trial site.
    Bishop JW
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 9022721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET Testing System.
    Rosenthal DL; Acosta D; Peters RK
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 8604564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of cellularity on the sensitivity of detecting squamous lesions in liquid-based cervical cytology.
    Studeman KD; Ioffe OB; Puszkiewicz J; Sauvegeot J; Henry MR
    Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(4):605-10. PubMed ID: 12920754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the PAPNET system for prescreening triage of cervicovaginal smears.
    Ashfaq R; Saliger F; Solares B; Thomas S; Liu G; Liang Y; Saboorian MH
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1058-64. PubMed ID: 9250299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Would monolayers provide more representative samples and improved preparations for cervical screening? Overview and evaluation of systems available.
    McGoogan E; Reith A
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):107-19. PubMed ID: 8604562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait.
    Luthra UK; Chishti M; Dey P; Jolly SV; Abdulla M; Das DK; Sugathan TN; Ajrawi MT; George J; George SS; Aziz AA; al-Juwaiser A; Karim FA; Mallik MK; Sheikh ZA; Khan S
    Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 11917577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study.
    Monsonego J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C
    Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 84(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 11161401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.