247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9987875)
1. Analysis and interpretation of short tandem repeat microvariants and three-banded allele patterns using multiple allele detection systems.
Crouse CA; Rogers S; Amiott E; Gibson S; Masibay A
J Forensic Sci; 1999 Jan; 44(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 9987875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of short tandem repeats (STRs) for forensic usage: performance testing of fluorescent multiplex STR systems and analysis of authentic and simulated forensic samples.
Moretti TR; Baumstark AL; Defenbaugh DA; Keys KM; Smerick JB; Budowle B
J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):647-60. PubMed ID: 11373004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Presentation of a three-banded allele pattern--analysis and interpretation.
Zamir A; Shpitzen M; Oz C; Motro U; Meiner V; Gafny R
J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jul; 47(4):824-6. PubMed ID: 12136991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency of the three STR loci (TPOX, CSF1PO, THo1), in a Japanese population determined using a Gene Print STR multiplex kit.
Yamaguchi H; Takizawa H; Shimasaki C
Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1996 Jun; 50(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 8752987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new allele of the short tandem repeat (STR) locus, CSF1PO.
Margolis-Nunno H; Brenner L; Cascardi J; Kobilinsky L
J Forensic Sci; 2001 Nov; 46(6):1480-3. PubMed ID: 11714163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of STR typing by capillary electrophoresis.
Moretti TR; Baumstark AL; Defenbaugh DA; Keys KM; Brown AL; Budowle B
J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):661-76. PubMed ID: 11373005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. TWGDAM validation of a nine-locus and a four-locus fluorescent STR multiplex system.
Micka KA; Amiott EA; Hockenberry TL; Sprecher CJ; Lins AM; Rabbach DR; Taylor JA; Bacher JW; Glidewell DE; Gibson SD; Crouse CA; Schumm JW
J Forensic Sci; 1999 Nov; 44(6):1243-57. PubMed ID: 10582363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genotyping of forensic short tandem repeat (STR) systems based on sizing precision in a capillary electrophoresis instrument.
Lazaruk K; Walsh PS; Oaks F; Gilbert D; Rosenblum BB; Menchen S; Scheibler D; Wenz HM; Holt C; Wallin J
Electrophoresis; 1998 Jan; 19(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 9511868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation and implementation of the PowerPlex 16 BIO System STR multiplex for forensic casework.
Greenspoon SA; Ban JD; Pablo L; Crouse CA; Kist FG; Tomsey CS; Glessner AL; Mihalacki LR; Long TM; Heidebrecht BJ; Braunstein CA; Freeman DA; Soberalski C; Nathan B; Amin AS; Douglas EK; Schumm JW
J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 14979347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of PowerPlex 16, PowerPlex1.1/2.1, and ABI AmpfISTR Profiler Plus/COfiler for forensic use.
Tomsey CS; Kurtz M; Kist F; Hockensmith M; Call P
Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 11387630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a 16-locus fluorescent multiplex system.
Krenke BE; Tereba A; Anderson SJ; Buel E; Culhane S; Finis CJ; Tomsey CS; Zachetti JM; Masibay A; Rabbach DR; Amiott EA; Sprecher CJ
J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jul; 47(4):773-85. PubMed ID: 12136984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation studies of the CTT STR multiplex system.
Budowle B; Moretti TR; Keys KM; Koons BW; Smerick JB
J Forensic Sci; 1997 Jul; 42(4):701-7. PubMed ID: 9243836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance evaluation of two multiplexes used in fluorescent short tandem repeat DNA analysis.
Buse EL; Putinier JC; Hong MM; Yap AE; Hartmann JM
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Mar; 48(2):348-57. PubMed ID: 12664993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving efficiency of a small forensic DNA laboratory: validation of robotic assays and evaluation of microcapillary array device.
Crouse CA; Yeung S; Greenspoon S; McGuckian A; Sikorsky J; Ban J; Mathies R
Croat Med J; 2005 Aug; 46(4):563-77. PubMed ID: 16100759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of multiplexed short tandem repeat (STR) systems using capillary array electrophoresis.
Mansfield ES; Robertson JM; Vainer M; Isenberg AR; Frazier RR; Ferguson K; Chow S; Harris DW; Barker DL; Gill PD; Budowle B; McCord BR
Electrophoresis; 1998 Jan; 19(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 9511870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A study of forensic DNA databases].
Sun D; Hou Y; Li Y; Wu J; Du Q
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 19(4):340-6. PubMed ID: 12170476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA typing with fluorescently tagged short tandem repeats: a sensitive and accurate approach to human identification.
Frégeau CJ; Fourney RM
Biotechniques; 1993 Jul; 15(1):100-19. PubMed ID: 8103347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Producing STR locus patterns from bloodstains and other forensic samples using an infrared fluorescent automated DNA sequencer.
Roy R; Steffens DL; Gartside B; Jang GY; Brumbaugh JA
J Forensic Sci; 1996 May; 41(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 8656180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. United Arab Emirates population data on three DNA tetrameric short tandem repeat loci: HUMTHO1, TPOX and CSF1PO--derived using multiplex polymerase chain reaction and manual typing.
Bayoumi RA; al-Gazali LI; Jaffer U; Nur-E-Kamal MS; Dawodu A; Bener A; Eapen V; Budowle B
Electrophoresis; 1997 Aug; 18(9):1637-40. PubMed ID: 9378136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Forensic validation of the short tandem repeat HUMACTBP2 using capillary electrophoresis.
Dimo-Simonin N; Grange F; Kratzer A; Brandt-Casadevall C; Mangin P
Electrophoresis; 1998 Feb; 19(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 9548288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
