These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 998810)

  • 1. Recognition thresholds as a function of word length.
    Richards LG; Heller FP
    Am J Psychol; 1976 Sep; 89(3):455-66. PubMed ID: 998810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Language experience shapes early electrophysiological responses to visual stimuli: the effects of writing system, stimulus length, and presentation duration.
    Xue G; Jiang T; Chen C; Dong Q
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):2025-37. PubMed ID: 18053744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
    Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reading in a regular orthography: an FMRI study investigating the role of visual familiarity.
    Ischebeck A; Indefrey P; Usui N; Nose I; Hellwig F; Taira M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 16(5):727-41. PubMed ID: 15200701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual word form familiarity and attention in lateral difference during processing Japanese Kana words.
    Nakagawa A; Sukigara M
    Brain Lang; 2000 Sep; 74(2):223-37. PubMed ID: 10950916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The psychological refractory period and the effect of stimulus discriminability.
    Tolkmitt FJ; Lunn SE
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 4742381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early involvement of dorsal and ventral pathways in visual word recognition: an ERP study.
    Rosazza C; Cai Q; Minati L; Paulignan Y; Nazir TA
    Brain Res; 2009 May; 1272():32-44. PubMed ID: 19332032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of form familiarity on perception of words, pseudowords, and nonwords in the two cerebral hemispheres.
    Jordan TR; Redwood M; Patching GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 May; 15(4):537-48. PubMed ID: 12803965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reading normal and degraded words: contribution of the dorsal and ventral visual pathways.
    Cohen L; Dehaene S; Vinckier F; Jobert A; Montavont A
    Neuroimage; 2008 Mar; 40(1):353-66. PubMed ID: 18182174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of stimulus attributes upon latency of word recognition.
    Richardson JT
    Br J Psychol; 1976 Aug; 67(3):315-25. PubMed ID: 974448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The neural substrates of visual perceptual learning of words: implications for the visual word form area hypothesis.
    Xue G; Poldrack RA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 19(10):1643-55. PubMed ID: 18271738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: evidence from reading English and French.
    Pynte J; Kennedy A
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3786-801. PubMed ID: 16938333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords.
    McClelland JL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Feb; 2(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 1262797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory pretraining as a determinant of visual thresholds for pseudowords.
    Richards LG; Hempstead JD
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Jun; 86(2):325-9. PubMed ID: 4775380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reading habits, perceptual learning, and recognition of printed words.
    Nazir TA; Ben-Boutayab N; Decoppet N; Deutsch A; Frost R
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):294-311. PubMed ID: 14967213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Does the perceptual threshold change the dominance between vision and touch].
    Becker-Carus C
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1973; 20(3):347-65. PubMed ID: 4757181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual identity and uncertainty in repetition blindness.
    Brill GA; Glass AL; Rashid H; Hussey E
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(3):409-49. PubMed ID: 18792718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition.
    Pelli DG; Farell B; Moore DC
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6941):752-6. PubMed ID: 12802334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Words, hemispheres, and dissociable subsystems: the effects of exposure duration, case alternation, priming, and continuity of form on word recognition in the left and right visual fields.
    Ellis AW; Ansorge L; Lavidor M
    Brain Lang; 2007 Dec; 103(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 17292463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.