These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 998810)
21. Magnetic stimulation of the left visual cortex impairs expert word recognition. Skarratt PA; Lavidor M J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1749-58. PubMed ID: 17014378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The use of structural diagnostics in recognition. Fox J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Feb; 104(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 1141836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reading aloud: qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context. O'Malley S; Besner D J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1400-11. PubMed ID: 18980404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Functional specificity of the visual word form area: general activation for words and symbols but specific network activation for words. Reinke K; Fernandes M; Schwindt G; O'Craven K; Grady CL Brain Lang; 2008 Feb; 104(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 17531309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Perceptual flexibility in word recognition: strategies affect orthographic computation but not lexical access. Carr TH; Davidson BJ; Hawkins HL J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Nov; 4(4):674-90. PubMed ID: 722255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effects of stimulus dimensionality on the rate of gain of information. Levy RM; Norton GK Q J Exp Psychol; 1972 Aug; 24(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 5049933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Visual matching as a function of stimulus complexity in normal and brain-injured persons. Mandleberg IA Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Jun; 34(3):859-66. PubMed ID: 5061606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Visual information and redundancy in reading. Thompson MC; Massaro DW J Exp Psychol; 1973 Apr; 98(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 4704213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Keeping an Eye on Effort: A Pupillometric Investigation of Effort and Effortlessness in Visual Word Recognition. Shechter A; Share DL Psychol Sci; 2021 Jan; 32(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 33259742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The "20-questions" technique: prediction of visual threshold and measurement of redundancy. Keen RH J Exp Psychol; 1973 Sep; 100(1):158-61. PubMed ID: 4744490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Visual discrimination: comparison of two methods. Fusaro JA; Kimble RL; O'Donnell M Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Apr; 42(2):654. PubMed ID: 1272709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of stimulus complexity and restrictive responses. Goldstein IL J Exp Psychol; 1966 Jan; 71(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 5902125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Bounding of letter sequences and the integration of visually presented words. Kolers PA; Lewis CL Acta Psychol (Amst); 1972 Apr; 36(2):112-24. PubMed ID: 5023851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of irrelevant information in speeded discrimination. Hawkins HL; McDonald GJ; Cox AK J Exp Psychol; 1973 May; 98(2):435-7. PubMed ID: 4705634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Visual serial search for letters, Roman and Arabic numbers. McCarthy SV Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):1077-8. PubMed ID: 4417649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect on choice-reaction time of stimulus information varied independently of transmitted information. Schlesinger IM; Melkman R J Gen Psychol; 1966 Jan; 74(1st Half):165-72. PubMed ID: 5901602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]