These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9988807)

  • 1. Lack of local reflection of national changes in cesarean delivery rates: the Canadian experience.
    Richman VV
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Feb; 180(2 Pt 1):393-5. PubMed ID: 9988807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Setting goals for reductions in Canadian cesarean delivery rates: benchmarking medical practice patterns.
    Richman VV
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):635-7. PubMed ID: 10486476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of midwifery care on rates of cesarean delivery.
    Lawton BA; Koch A; Stanley J; Geller SE
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 123(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 24095309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s: international comparison by indication.
    Notzon FC; Cnattingius S; Bergsjø P; Cole S; Taffel S; Irgens L; Daltveit AK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 170(2):495-504. PubMed ID: 8116703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. National trends in primary cesarean delivery, labor attempts, and labor success, 1990-2010.
    Simon AE; Uddin SG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 209(6):554.e1-8. PubMed ID: 23954531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Geographic Variations and Temporal Trends in Cesarean Delivery Rates in China, 2008-2014.
    Li HT; Luo S; Trasande L; Hellerstein S; Kang C; Li JX; Zhang Y; Liu JM; Blustein J
    JAMA; 2017 Jan; 317(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 28030701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Declining cesarean section rates: a continuing trend?
    Millar WJ; Nair C; Wadhera S
    Health Rep; 1996; 8(1):17-24 (Eng); 17-24 (Fre). PubMed ID: 8844177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between the rising cesarean delivery and postpartum readmission rates.
    Clapp MA; Robinson JN; Little SE
    J Perinatol; 2017 Apr; 37(4):355-359. PubMed ID: 28079871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Downward trends in surgical site and urinary tract infections after cesarean delivery in a French surveillance network, 1997-2003.
    Vincent A; Ayzac L; Girard R; Caillat-Vallet E; Chapuis C; Depaix F; Dumas AM; Gignoux C; Haond C; Lafarge-Leboucher J; Launay C; Tissot-Guerraz F; Fabry J;
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 29(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 18257692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cesarean delivery and perinatal mortality rates in Japan, 2007-2011.
    Ishikawa K; Ikeda T; Miyazaki R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Jul; 27(10):994-9. PubMed ID: 24060236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trends in cesarean section deliveries in Canada.
    Nair C
    Health Rep; 1991; 3(3):203-19. PubMed ID: 1801954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rates of cesarean delivery--United States, 1993.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1995 Apr; 44(15):303-7. PubMed ID: 7708041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The trend in pregnancies terminated by a cesarean operation in Mexico during 1991-1995].
    Juárez Ocaña SJ; Fajardo Gutiérrez A; Pérez Palacios G; Guerrero Morales RG; Gómez Delgado A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1999 Jul; 67():308-18. PubMed ID: 10496052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Secular trends of cesarean delivery and cesarean delivery on maternal request among primiparous women with singleton pregnancy in Southern and Northern China during 1993-2010].
    Zhu YB; Li HT; Zhang YL; Li ZW; Zhang L; Liu JM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jul; 92(25):1734-7. PubMed ID: 22944178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recent trends in cesarean birth and trial of labor rates in the United States.
    Shiono PH; Fielden JG; McNellis D; Rhoads GG; Pearse WH
    JAMA; 1987 Jan 23-30; 257(4):494-7. PubMed ID: 3795432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lowered national cesarean section rates after a concerted action.
    Ayres-De-Campos D; Cruz J; Medeiros-Borges C; Costa-Santos C; Vicente L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Apr; 94(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 25783672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
    Eskew PN; Saywell RM; Zollinger TW; Erner BK; Oser TL
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):809-17. PubMed ID: 7837129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Declining cesarean delivery rates in California: an effect of managed care?
    Weinstein RB; Trussell J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 179(3 Pt 1):657-64. PubMed ID: 9757967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cesarean section trends in the Nordic Countries - a comparative analysis with the Robson classification.
    Pyykönen A; Gissler M; Løkkegaard E; Bergholt T; Rasmussen SC; Smárason A; Bjarnadóttir RI; Másdóttir BB; Källén K; Klungsoyr K; Albrechtsen S; Skjeldestad FE; Tapper AM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 May; 96(5):607-616. PubMed ID: 28176334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maternal request is not to blame for an increase in the rate of Cesarean section.
    Kačerauskienė J; Barčaitė E; Bartusevičius A; Railaitė D; Nadišauskienė R
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2012; 48(12):647-52. PubMed ID: 23652623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.