These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9990514)

  • 1. Image can be reversed between scout and axial views on Elscint CT Twin and Helicat computed tomography scanners.
    Health Devices; 1998 Dec; 27(12):445-7. PubMed ID: 9990514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-accessible rotating-gantry components in GE HiSpeed Advantage CT scanners.
    Health Devices; 1993; 22(8-9):425-6. PubMed ID: 8226022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selecting a new computed tomography scanner: things to consider.
    McNitt-Gray MF; Morin RL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 17411524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance standards for ionizing radiation emitting products: diagnostic x-ray systems and their major components; computed tomography equipment; removal of a requirement; citizen petition--FDA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1991 Jul; 56(147):36098. PubMed ID: 10113838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT radiation dose and image quality.
    Payne JT
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2005 Nov; 43(6):953-62, vii. PubMed ID: 16253656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CT scans can affect the operation of implanted electronic devices.
    ECRI Institute
    Health Devices; 2007 Apr; 36(4):136-8. PubMed ID: 17555167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed tomography: the most important advancement in radiography since the discovery of x-rays.
    Stanley JH
    Stand News; 1995 Jan; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 10160504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assurance in CT.
    Stein KM
    Radiol Technol; 2000; 72(1):67. PubMed ID: 11019412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Importance in optimization of multi-slice computed tomography scan protocols.
    Heggie JC; Kay JK; Lee WK
    Australas Radiol; 2006 Jun; 50(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 16732832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of simulator accuracy with treatment planning CT scans.
    Kasat R; Velkley D; Singapuri K; Stryker J
    Adm Radiol; 1992 Mar; 11(3):61, 63-4, 69. PubMed ID: 10117672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative assessment of the influence of location, internal temperature, idle time, and normalization on the sensitivity of a mobile PET/CT scanner.
    Belakhlef S; Church C; Hays A; Fraser R; Lakhanpal S
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2008 Sep; 36(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 18703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy comparison of a 16 and 64 multidetector-row computed tomography scanner to image small high-density structures.
    Rollano-Hijarrubia E; Stokking R; Niessen WJ
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):781-92. PubMed ID: 17035868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PET performance measurements for an LSO-based combined PET/CT scanner using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 standard.
    Erdi YE; Nehmeh SA; Mulnix T; Humm JL; Watson CC
    J Nucl Med; 2004 May; 45(5):813-21. PubMed ID: 15136631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concurrent PET/CT with an integrated imaging system: intersociety dialogue from the Joint Working Group of the American College of Radiology, the Society of Nuclear Medicine, and the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance.
    Coleman RE; Delbeke D; Guiberteau MJ; Conti PS; Royal HD; Weinreb JC; Siegel BA; Federle MP; Townsend DW; Berland LL; ; ;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jul; 2(7):568-84. PubMed ID: 17411882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.
    Kinahan PE; Hasegawa BH; Beyer T
    Semin Nucl Med; 2003 Jul; 33(3):166-79. PubMed ID: 12931319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preparing for the costs of XR-29 a new standard for CT radiation dose monitoring.
    Sferrella SM
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2015 Oct; 69(10):38-41. PubMed ID: 26595974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Features to consider when selecting a new CT scanner.
    Mahesh M
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Oct; 7(10):820-2. PubMed ID: 20889116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selecting a new PET/CT system.
    Madsen MT
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 May; 1(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 17411602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physician warn patients on CT screening.
    Dixon GD
    Mo Med; 2002; 99(10):526. PubMed ID: 12534139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reference levels for image quality in mammography.
    Zdesar U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.