BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

Terms: = Breast cancer AND CCND3, P30281, 896, ENSG00000112576 AND Diagnosis
34 results:

  • 1. Adding quantitative T1rho-weighted imaging to conventional MRI improves specificity and sensitivity for differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions.
    Wang L; Wang X; Jiang F; Cao Y; Liu S; Chen H; Yang J; Zhang X; Yu T; Xu H; Lin M; Wu Y; Zhang J
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 May; 108():98-103. PubMed ID: 38331054
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonlobular Invasive breast Carcinomas with Biallelic Pathogenic CDH1 Somatic Alterations: A Histologic, Immunophenotypic, and Genomic Characterization.
    Derakhshan F; Da Cruz Paula A; Selenica P; da Silva EM; Grabenstetter A; Jalali S; Gazzo AM; Dopeso H; Marra A; Brown DN; Ross DS; Mandelker D; Razavi P; Chandarlapaty S; Wen HY; Brogi E; Zhang H; Weigelt B; Pareja F; Reis-Filho JS
    Mod Pathol; 2024 Feb; 37(2):100375. PubMed ID: 37925055
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metastases to the pituitary gland: insights from the German pituitary tumor registry.
    Haberbosch L; Schmid S; Hubertus V; Soll D; Acker G; Dottermusch M; Jensen M; Maurer L; Spranger J; Mai K; Vajkoczy P; Saeger W; Strasburger CJ
    Pituitary; 2023 Dec; 26(6):708-715. PubMed ID: 37899389
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in the pre-operative diagnosis and surgical management of axillary lymph node metastases in women with screen-detected breast cancer.
    Duijm LEM; Strobbe LJA; van Breest Smallenburg V; Op de Coul-Froger CL; Setz-Pels W; Vreuls W; van Beek HC; van Bommel RMG; Voogd AC
    Breast; 2023 Dec; 72():103593. PubMed ID: 37890215
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein acts as a molecular biomarker in multiple cancer types.
    Guo B; Wang Y; Liu W; Zhang S
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2023 Feb; 25(2):535-554. PubMed ID: 36255654
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative efficacy study of diagnostic digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in BI-RADS 4 breast cancer diagnosis.
    Ezeana CF; Puppala M; Wang L; Chang JC; Wong STC
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Aug; 153():110361. PubMed ID: 35617870
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Depiction of breast cancers on digital mammograms by artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis according to cancer characteristics.
    Lee SE; Han K; Yoon JH; Youk JH; Kim EK
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7400-7408. PubMed ID: 35499564
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variation over time of the factors influencing return to work and work capacities after a diagnosis of breast cancer: a study on the behalf of the Seintinelles research network.
    Hequet D; Hamy AS; Girard N; Laas E; Coussy F; Rouzier R; Preau M; Delrieu L; Dumas A; Reyal F
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Jul; 30(7):5991-5999. PubMed ID: 35396963
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The association between conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound appearances and pathological features in small breast cancer.
    Chen J; Li CX; Shao SH; Yao MH; Su YJ; Wu R
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2022; 80(4):413-422. PubMed ID: 34842181
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in breast cancer-risk factors between screen-detected and non-screen-detected cases (MCC-Spain study).
    Hernández-García M; Molina-Barceló A; Vanaclocha-Espi M; Zurriaga Ó; Pérez-Gómez B; Aragonés N; Amiano P; Altzibar JM; Castaño-Vinyals G; Sala M; Ederra M; Martín V; Gómez-Acebo I; Vidal C; Tardón A; Marcos-Gragera R; Pollán M; Kogevinas M; Salas D
    Cancer Causes Control; 2022 Jan; 33(1):125-136. PubMed ID: 34817770
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. breast cancer incidence and early diagnosis in a family history risk and prevention clinic: 33-year experience in 14,311 women.
    Evans DG; Howell SJ; Gandhi A; van Veen EM; Woodward ER; Harvey J; Barr L; Wallace A; Lalloo F; Wilson M; Hurley E; Lim Y; Maxwell AJ; Harkness EF; Howell A
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Oct; 189(3):677-687. PubMed ID: 34312777
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pregnancy after breast cancer: Results from a prospective cohort of young women with breast cancer.
    Poorvu PD; Gelber SI; Zheng Y; Ruddy KJ; Tamimi RM; Peppercorn J; Schapira L; Borges VF; Come SE; Lambertini M; Rosenberg SM; Partridge AH
    Cancer; 2021 Apr; 127(7):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 33259061
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast.
    Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diffusion-weighted imaging or dynamic contrast-enhanced curve: a retrospective analysis of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-based differential diagnoses of benign and malignant breast lesions.
    Yang X; Dong M; Li S; Chai R; Zhang Z; Li N; Zhang L
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):4795-4805. PubMed ID: 32350660
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital pathology for primary diagnosis of screen-detected breast lesions - experimental data, validation and experience from four centres.
    Williams B; Hanby A; Millican-Slater R; Verghese E; Nijhawan A; Wilson I; Besusparis J; Clark D; Snead D; Rakha E; Treanor D
    Histopathology; 2020 Jun; 76(7):968-975. PubMed ID: 31994224
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation Between
    Yu P; Lei J; Xu B; Wang R; Shen Z; Tian J
    Acad Radiol; 2020 May; 27(5):682-688. PubMed ID: 31311773
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying distinct trajectories of change in young breast cancer survivors' sexual functioning.
    von Hippel C; Rosenberg SM; Austin SB; Sprunck-Harrild K; Ruddy KJ; Schapira L; Come S; Borges VF; Partridge AH
    Psychooncology; 2019 May; 28(5):1033-1040. PubMed ID: 30817075
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Value of Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in Differentiating Malignant From Benign breast Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Bin L; Huihui Y; Weiping Y; Changyuan W; Qinghong Q; Weiyu M
    Ultrasound Q; 2019 Mar; 35(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 30807546
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-specific breast cancer risk by body mass index and familial risk: prospective family study cohort (ProF-SC).
    Hopper JL; Dite GS; MacInnis RJ; Liao Y; Zeinomar N; Knight JA; Southey MC; Milne RL; Chung WK; Giles GG; Genkinger JM; McLachlan SA; Friedlander ML; Antoniou AC; Weideman PC; Glendon G; Nesci S; ; Andrulis IL; Buys SS; Daly MB; John EM; Phillips KA; Terry MB
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Nov; 20(1):132. PubMed ID: 30390716
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefit of Shear-wave Elastography in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion: a diagnostic meta-analysis.
    Luo J; Cao Y; Nian W; Zeng X; Zhang H; Yue Y; Yu F
    Med Ultrason; 2018 Feb; 1(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 29400367
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  


    [Next]

    of 2.