BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

Terms: = Cervical cancer AND CARS, P49589, 833, ENSG00000110619 AND Treatment
12 results:

  • 1. Efficacy of treatment patterns based on concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage IIB cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
    Pan XB; Lu Y; Wei YS; Yao DS
    BMC Cancer; 2024 Jan; 24(1):106. PubMed ID: 38238689
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Synthesis of 3-(2-Alkylthio-4-chloro-5-methylbenzenesulfonyl)-2-(1-phenyl-3-arylprop-2-enylideneamino)guanidine Derivatives with Pro-Apoptotic Activity against cancer Cells.
    Pogorzelska A; Sławiński J; Kawiak A; Stasiłojć G; Chojnacki J
    Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Feb; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 36901869
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Engineered T Cell Therapy for Gynecologic Malignancies: Challenges and Opportunities.
    Xu Y; Jiang J; Wang Y; Wang W; Li H; Lai W; Zhou Z; Zhu W; Xiang Z; Wang Z; Zhu Z; Yu L; Huang X; Zheng H; Wu S
    Front Immunol; 2021; 12():725330. PubMed ID: 34386017
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in HIV-Related cervical cancer Over a Decade in Côte d'Ivoire.
    Jaquet A; Boni S; Tchounga B; Comoe K; Tanon A; Horo A; Diomandé I; Didi-Kouko Coulibaly J; Ekouevi DK; Adoubi I
    JCO Glob Oncol; 2021 May; 7():782-789. PubMed ID: 34043415
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An 8-gene DNA methylation signature predicts the recurrence risk of cervical cancer.
    Ma JH; Huang Y; Liu LY; Feng Z
    J Int Med Res; 2021 May; 49(5):3000605211018443. PubMed ID: 34034542
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of cervical carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and FIGO staging.
    Chen M; Feng C; Wang Q; Li J; Wu S; Hu D; Deng B; Li Z
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 137():109557. PubMed ID: 33549900
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Nie JC; Yan AQ; Liu XS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Nov; 27(9):1990-1999. PubMed ID: 28858908
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient compliance with cervical smear surveillance in a shared-care setting.
    Tse KY; Lau SK; Lui MW; Ip PP; Cheung AN; Ngan HY
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Nov; 135(2):177-181. PubMed ID: 27451399
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CD4 T-LYMPHOCYTE SUBSETS IN WOMEN WITH INVASIVE cervical cancer IN KENYA.
    Gichangi P; Gathece L; Estambale B; Temmerman M
    East Afr Med J; 2013 Oct; 90(10):309-15. PubMed ID: 26862640
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of survival and adverse events between women with stage IB1 and stage IB2 cervical cancer treated by laparoscopic radical vaginal hysterectomy.
    Hong JH; Choi JS; Lee JH; Son CE; Jeon SW; Bae JW; Eom JM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):605-11. PubMed ID: 21769469
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.
    Leyden WA; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Mouchawar J; Bischoff K; Yood MU; Gilbert J; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 15870438
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Serum tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) in locoregional failure and distant metastasis of cervical carcinoma.
    Pattaranutaporn P; Chansilpa Y; Ieumwananonthachai N; Sukkasem M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Sep; 83(9):1011-5. PubMed ID: 11075966
    [TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]  


    of 1.