Terms: = Cervical cancer AND ELK4, SAP1, 2005, ENSG00000158711, P28324 AND Staging
75 results:
1. [Assessment of the diagnostic value and prognosis of different detection markers in endocervical adenocarcinoma].
Zhang CN; Liu XY; Li Q; Song YZ; Liu B; Yin J; Yang JH; Zhong L; Sun L; Zhang X; Chen W
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 May; 45(5):402-409. PubMed ID: 37188625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis.
Okugawa K; Yahata H; Ohgami T; Yasunaga M; Asanoma K; Kobayashi H; Kato K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 May; 34(3):e41. PubMed ID: 36807744
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The prognostic value of the presence of pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients; the influence of the new FIGO classification (stage IIIC).
van Kol KGG; Ebisch RMF; van der Aa M; Wenzel HB; Piek JMJ; Bekkers RLM
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 171():9-14. PubMed ID: 36804623
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Tumor histology is an independent prognostic factor in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: A retrospective study.
Gallardo-Alvarado L; Cantú-de León D; Ramirez-Morales R; Santiago-Concha G; Barquet-Muñoz S; Salcedo-Hernandez R; Reyes C; Perez-Alvarez S; Perez-Montiel D; Perez-Plasencia C; Trejo-Duran E; Galicia JP
BMC Cancer; 2022 Apr; 22(1):401. PubMed ID: 35418030
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
Mohamud A; Høgdall C; Schnack T
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 165(3):506-513. PubMed ID: 35346512
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A nomogram prediction model for lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer patients.
Wang Z; Zhang S; Ma Y; Li W; Tian J; Liu T
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(1):748. PubMed ID: 34187416
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-operative surgical algorithm: sentinel lymph node biopsy as predictor of parametrial involvement in early-stage cervical cancer.
Balaya V; Bresset A; Guani B; Benoit L; Magaud L; Bonsang-Kitzis H; Ngo C; Mathevet P; Lécuru F;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1317-1325. PubMed ID: 32753560
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of papillary thyroid carcinoma in younger patients.
Lu Y; Jiang L; Chen C; Chen H; Yao Q
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Apr; 99(15):e19795. PubMed ID: 32282744
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a New Prognostic Tumor Score in Locally Advanced cervical cancer Integrating Clinical Examination and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Lindegaard JC; Petric P; Lindegaard AM; Tanderup K; Fokdal LU
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Mar; 106(4):754-763. PubMed ID: 31794837
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI for Radiation Therapy Planning in Human Papillomavirus-associated Gynecologic cancers.
Venkatesan AM; Menias CO; Jones KM; Rauch GM; Stafford RJ; Klopp AH
Radiographics; 2019; 39(5):1476-1500. PubMed ID: 31498740
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abnormal menstruation after radical trachelectomy and its effects on fertility.
Matsuoka M; Taga A; Hata S; Yamamoto R; Ando Y; Kozono Y; Tsuji N; Sekiyama K; Higuchi T; Nagano T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1906-1912. PubMed ID: 31215125
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel prediction score for predicting the baseline risk of recurrence of stage I-II endometrial carcinoma.
Takahashi K; Yunokawa M; Sasada S; Takehara Y; Miyasaka N; Kato T; Tamura K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):e8. PubMed ID: 30479092
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A study of clinicopathological characteristics of thyroid carcinoma at a Tertiary Care Center.
Shah AA; Jain PP; Dubey AS; Panjwani GN; Shah HA
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(2):357-360. PubMed ID: 29516919
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Temporal Trends in the Presentation, Treatment, and Outcome of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: An Israeli Multicenter Study.
Hirsch D; Twito O; Levy S; Bachar G; Robenshtok E; Gross DJ; Mazeh H; Benbassat C; Grozinsky-Glasberg S
Thyroid; 2018 Mar; 28(3):369-376. PubMed ID: 29402183
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Analysis of Recurrence Patterns in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy.
Wang L; Guo Y; Xu J; Chen Z; Jiang X; Zhang L; Huang S; He X; Zhang Y
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2017 Dec; 126(12):789-797. PubMed ID: 29025277
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival of Patients with Serous Uterine Carcinoma Undergoing Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping.
Schiavone MB; Scelzo C; Straight C; Zhou Q; Alektiar KM; Makker V; Soslow RA; Iasonos A; Leitao MM; Abu-Rustum NR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1965-1971. PubMed ID: 28258415
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative work-up for definition of lymph node risk involvement in early stage endometrial cancer: 5-year follow-up.
Cignini P; Vitale SG; Laganà AS; Biondi A; La Rosa VL; Cutillo G
Updates Surg; 2017 Mar; 69(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 28108938
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative ultrasonography for evaluation of clinically N0 neck in oral cavity carcinoma.
Rollon-Mayordomo A; Creo-Martinez T; Marin-Lapeira Y; Rodriguez-Ruiz JA; Infante-Cossio P
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Mar; 45(3):420-426. PubMed ID: 28108239
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative platelet count improves the prognostic prediction of the FIGO staging system for operable cervical cancer patients.
Zheng RR; Huang XX; Jin C; Zhuang XX; Ye LC; Zheng FY; Lin F
Clin Chim Acta; 2017 Oct; 473():198-203. PubMed ID: 27836106
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors involved in the delay of treatment initiation for cervical cancer patients: A nationwide population-based study.
Shen SC; Hung YC; Kung PT; Yang WH; Wang YH; Tsai WC
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Aug; 95(33):e4568. PubMed ID: 27537583
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next]
