Terms: = Ovarian cancer AND RMI2, MGC24665, 116028, C16orf75, ENSG00000175643 AND Diagnosis
5 results:
1. Comparisons of Effectiveness in Differentiating Benign from Malignant ovarian Masses between Conventional and Modified Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI).
Tantipalakorn C; Tinnangwattana D; Lerthiranwong T; Luewan S; Tongsong T
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36613208
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the predictive performance of risk of malignancy indexes 1-4, HE4 and risk of malignancy algorithm in the triage of adnexal masses.
Hada A; Han LP; Chen Y; Hu QH; Yuan Y; Liu L
J Ovarian Res; 2020 Apr; 13(1):46. PubMed ID: 32334618
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The accuracy of risk malignancy index in prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal mass in Basrah, Iraq.
Al-Asadi JN; Al-Maliki SK; Al-Dahhhan F; Al-Naama L; Suood F
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1254-1259. PubMed ID: 30297555
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Should cut-off values of the risk of malignancy index be changed for evaluation of adnexal masses in Asian and Pacific populations?
Yavuzcan A; Caglar M; Ozgu E; Ustun Y; Dilbaz S; Ozdemir I; Yildiz E; Gungor T; Kumru S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(9):5455-9. PubMed ID: 24175841
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Application values of four risk of malignancy indices in the preoperative evaluation of patients with adnexal masses].
Lou HY; Meng H; Zhu QL; Zhang Q; Jiang YX
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2010 Jun; 32(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 20602883
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
