Terms: = Uterine cancer AND ELK4, SAP1, 2005, ENSG00000158711, P28324 AND Staging
129 results:
1. [Assessment of the diagnostic value and prognosis of different detection markers in endocervical adenocarcinoma].
Zhang CN; Liu XY; Li Q; Song YZ; Liu B; Yin J; Yang JH; Zhong L; Sun L; Zhang X; Chen W
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 May; 45(5):402-409. PubMed ID: 37188625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of lymphovascular space invasion on survival in early stage low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer.
Yarandi F; Shirali E; Akhavan S; Nili F; Ramhormozian S
Eur J Med Res; 2023 Mar; 28(1):118. PubMed ID: 36915143
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis.
Okugawa K; Yahata H; Ohgami T; Yasunaga M; Asanoma K; Kobayashi H; Kato K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 May; 34(3):e41. PubMed ID: 36807744
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The prognostic value of the presence of pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients; the influence of the new FIGO classification (stage IIIC).
van Kol KGG; Ebisch RMF; van der Aa M; Wenzel HB; Piek JMJ; Bekkers RLM
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 171():9-14. PubMed ID: 36804623
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Tumor histology is an independent prognostic factor in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: A retrospective study.
Gallardo-Alvarado L; Cantú-de León D; Ramirez-Morales R; Santiago-Concha G; Barquet-Muñoz S; Salcedo-Hernandez R; Reyes C; Perez-Alvarez S; Perez-Montiel D; Perez-Plasencia C; Trejo-Duran E; Galicia JP
BMC Cancer; 2022 Apr; 22(1):401. PubMed ID: 35418030
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
Mohamud A; Høgdall C; Schnack T
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 165(3):506-513. PubMed ID: 35346512
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The 10-year results after national introduction of pelvic lymph node staging in Danish intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients not given postoperative radiotherapy.
Ørtoft G; Høgdall C; Hansen ES; Dueholm M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Aug; 263():239-246. PubMed ID: 34247041
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A nomogram prediction model for lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer patients.
Wang Z; Zhang S; Ma Y; Li W; Tian J; Liu T
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(1):748. PubMed ID: 34187416
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Adjuvant therapy and prognosis in uterine carcinosarcoma.
Chiang CY; Huang HJ; Chang WY; Yang LY; Wu RC; Wang CC; Tung HJ; Chao A; Lai CH
J Formos Med Assoc; 2021 Nov; 120(11):1977-1987. PubMed ID: 33992491
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pre-operative surgical algorithm: sentinel lymph node biopsy as predictor of parametrial involvement in early-stage cervical cancer.
Balaya V; Bresset A; Guani B; Benoit L; Magaud L; Bonsang-Kitzis H; Ngo C; Mathevet P; Lécuru F;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1317-1325. PubMed ID: 32753560
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Incidence of pelvic lymph node metastasis using modern FIGO staging and sentinel lymph node mapping with ultrastaging in surgically staged patients with endometrioid and serous endometrial carcinoma.
Mueller JJ; Pedra Nobre S; Braxton K; Alektiar KM; Leitao MM; Aghajanian C; Ellenson LH; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jun; 157(3):619-623. PubMed ID: 32247604
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical efficacy and pregnancy outcomes of fertility-preserving re-treatment after recurrence of the patient with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early stage endometrial carcinoma].
He YJ; Wang YQ; Tang HR; He M; Rao Y; Zhou R; Wang JL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Jan; 55(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 32074769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a New Prognostic Tumor Score in Locally Advanced Cervical cancer Integrating Clinical Examination and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Lindegaard JC; Petric P; Lindegaard AM; Tanderup K; Fokdal LU
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Mar; 106(4):754-763. PubMed ID: 31794837
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Omental Micrometastasis in Endometrial cancer.
Bayrak M; Yılmaz A; Yılmaz F; İlhan O; Oz Atalay F; Ozan H
Oncol Res Treat; 2019; 42(9):466-469. PubMed ID: 31340208
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abnormal menstruation after radical trachelectomy and its effects on fertility.
Matsuoka M; Taga A; Hata S; Yamamoto R; Ando Y; Kozono Y; Tsuji N; Sekiyama K; Higuchi T; Nagano T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1906-1912. PubMed ID: 31215125
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Location of recurrences in high-risk stage Iendometrial cancer patients not given postoperative radiotherapy: A Danish gynecological cancer group study.
Ørtoft G; Høgdall C; Juhl C; Petersen LK; Hansen ES; Dueholm M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):497-504. PubMed ID: 30833438
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact and cost of preoperative computed tomography imaging on the management of patients diagnosed with high-grade endometrial cancer.
Dai S; Nahas S; Murphy JK; Lawrence J; May T; Feigenberg T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 May; 145(2):219-224. PubMed ID: 30784043
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Epithelial ovarian cancer and fertility preservation: Article drafted from the French Guidelines in oncology entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY under the aegis of CNGOF and endorsed by INCa].
Uzan C; Courbiere B; Chabbert-Buffet N
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Feb; 47(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 30704956
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for surgical staging of patients with presumed low-risk endometrial cancer: The current state of Japan.
Deura I; Shimada M; Azuma Y; Komatsu H; Nagira K; Sawada M; Harada T
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 58(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 30638490
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel prediction score for predicting the baseline risk of recurrence of stage I-II endometrial carcinoma.
Takahashi K; Yunokawa M; Sasada S; Takehara Y; Miyasaka N; Kato T; Tamura K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):e8. PubMed ID: 30479092
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next]
