Terms: = Uterine cancer AND MAX, MGC36767, 4149, ENSG00000125952, MGC18164, MGC10775, P61244, MGC11225, orf1, MGC34679 AND Staging
17 results:
1. [
Adam JA; Poel E; van Eck Smit BLF; Mom CH; Stalpers LJA; Laan JJ; Kidd E; Stoker J; Bipat S
BMC Cancer; 2024 Apr; 24(1):513. PubMed ID: 38654241
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic value of integrated
Yu Y; Zhang L; Sultana B; Wang B; Sun H
BMC Cancer; 2022 Sep; 22(1):947. PubMed ID: 36050751
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal method for metabolic tumour volume assessment of cervical cancers with inter-observer agreement on [18F]-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography.
Arshad MA; Gitau S; Tam H; Park WE; Patel NH; Rockall A; Aboagye EO; Bharwani N; Barwick TD
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jun; 48(6):2009-2023. PubMed ID: 33313962
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Pre-treatment prediction of early response to chemoradiotherapy by quantitative analysis of baseline staging FDG-PET/CT and MRI in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Min LA; Ackermans LL; Nowee ME; Griethuysen JJV; Roberti S; Maas M; Vogel WV; Beets-Tan RG; Lambregts DM
Acta Radiol; 2021 Jul; 62(7):940-948. PubMed ID: 32722967
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5.
Nguyen NC; Beriwal S; Moon CH; Furlan A; Mountz JM; Rangaswamy B
J Nucl Med Technol; 2020 Dec; 48(4):331-335. PubMed ID: 32709671
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity and Quantitative
Pinho DF; King B; Xi Y; Albuquerque K; Lea J; Subramaniam RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):908-916. PubMed ID: 32069078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The vaginal cylinder: Misunderstood, misused, or trivial? An in-depth dosimetric and multiinstitutional outcome investigation.
Guy CL; Fields EC; Quinn BA; Fisher CM; Ladbury CJ; Romano KD; Todor D
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(6):763-770. PubMed ID: 31558353
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic values of ADC
Akkus Yildirim B; Onal C; Erbay G; Cem Guler O; Karadeli E; Reyhan M; Koc Z
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Feb; 39(2):224-230. PubMed ID: 30354907
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The prognostic significance of pretreatment [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging in patients with uterine cervical cancer: preliminary results.
Cho SH; Lim JY; Kim SN; Hong S; Chung HW; So Y; Kim WY; Lee SJ
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2015; 36(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 25872331
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Current applications of PET imaging of sex hormone receptors with a fluorinated analogue of estradiol or of testosterone.
Talbot JN; Gligorov J; Nataf V; Montravers F; Huchet V; Michaud L; Ohnona J; Balogova S; Cussenot O; Daraï E; Lotz JP; Kerrou K
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Mar; 59(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 25693420
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic value of preoperative metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.
Chung HH; Kwon HW; Kang KW; Park NH; Song YS; Chung JK; Kang SB; Kim JW
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):1966-72. PubMed ID: 22124757
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Post-treatment [¹⁸F]FDG maximum standardized uptake value as a prognostic marker of recurrence in endometrial carcinoma.
Chung HH; Kim JW; Kang KW; Park NH; Song YS; Chung JK; Kang SB
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2011 Jan; 38(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 20838994
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. FDG PET-CT in cervical cancer: relationship between primary tumor FDG uptake and metastatic potential.
Yilmaz M; Adli M; Celen Z; Zincirkeser S; Dirier A
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Jun; 31(6):526-31. PubMed ID: 20215979
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Standardized uptake value in para-aortic lymph nodes is a significant prognostic factor in patients with primary advanced squamous cervical cancer.
Yen TC; See LC; Lai CH; Tsai CS; Chao A; Hsueh S; Hong JH; Chang TC; Ng KK
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Mar; 35(3):493-501. PubMed ID: 17955238
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The standardized uptake value for F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose is a sensitive predictive biomarker for cervical cancer treatment response and survival.
Kidd EA; Siegel BA; Dehdashti F; Grigsby PW
Cancer; 2007 Oct; 110(8):1738-44. PubMed ID: 17786947
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Port site metastasis after laparoscopy for uterine cervical carcinoma.
Agostini A; Carcopino X; Franchi F; Cravello L; Lécuru F; Blanc B
Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1663-5. PubMed ID: 12915964
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [MRI in evaluation of myometrial invasion and staging of endometrial carcinoma].
Kaketa M; Takemoto O; Akamine M; Iwasaki H; Takamizawa H
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jul; 41(7):859-66. PubMed ID: 2794618
[TBL] [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
