PubMed for Handhelds
U.S. National Library of Medicine

116 related items for PubMed ID: 16945862

  • 1. Understanding spatial diagram structure: an analysis of hierarchies, matrices, and networks.
    Novick LR.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Oct; 59(10):1826-56. PubMed ID: 16945862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. To Matrix, Network, or Hierarchy: That Is the Question.
    Novick LR, Hurley SM.
    Cogn Psychol; 2001 Mar; 42(2):158-216. PubMed ID: 11259107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Solving problems using matrix, network, and hierarchy diagrams: the consequences of violating construction conventions.
    Hurley SM, Novick LR.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):275-90. PubMed ID: 19440931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comprehending 3D Diagrams: Sketching to Support Spatial Reasoning.
    Gagnier KM, Atit K, Ormand CJ, Shipley TF.
    Top Cogn Sci; 2017 10; 9(4):883-901. PubMed ID: 27886450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Are diagrams always helpful tools? developmental and individual differences in the effect of presentation format on student problem solving.
    Booth JL, Koedinger KR.
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2012 Sep; 82(Pt 3):492-511. PubMed ID: 22881051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Relational spatial reasoning by a nonhuman: the example of capuchin monkeys.
    Fragaszy DM, Cummins-Sebree SE.
    Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev; 2005 Dec; 4(4):282-306. PubMed ID: 16585801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The development of mental processing: efficiency, working memory, and thinking.
    Demetriou A, Christou C, Spanoudis G, Platsidou M.
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2002 Dec; 67(1):i-viii, 1-155; discussion 156. PubMed ID: 12360826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Action comprehension: deriving spatial and functional relations.
    Bach P, Knoblich G, Gunter TC, Friederici AD, Prinz W.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Jun; 31(3):465-79. PubMed ID: 15982126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cultural commonalities and differences in spatial problem-solving: a computational analysis.
    Lovett A, Forbus K.
    Cognition; 2011 Nov; 121(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 21803347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Diagram comprehension ability of college students in an introductory biology course.
    Kottmeyer AM, Van Meter P, Cameron C.
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2020 Jun 01; 44(2):169-180. PubMed ID: 32167833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Extended experience benefits spatial mental model development with route but not survey descriptions.
    Brunyé TT, Taylor HA.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb 01; 127(2):340-54. PubMed ID: 17723221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning.
    Tenenbaum JB, Griffiths TL, Kemp C.
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jul 01; 10(7):309-18. PubMed ID: 16797219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The functional and developmental organization of cognitive developmental sequences.
    Demetriou A, Kyriakides L.
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2006 Jun 01; 76(Pt 2):209-42. PubMed ID: 16719961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Quantitative and qualitative sex differences in spatial navigation.
    Lövdén M, Herlitz A, Schellenbach M, Grossman-Hutter B, Krüger A, Lindenberger U.
    Scand J Psychol; 2007 Oct 01; 48(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 17877549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Embodied representation of the body contains veridical spatial information.
    Struiksma ME, Noordzij ML, Postma A.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun 01; 64(6):1124-37. PubMed ID: 21424986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. CogSketch: sketch understanding for cognitive science research and for education.
    Forbus K, Usher J, Lovett A, Lockwood K, Wetzel J.
    Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Oct 01; 3(4):648-66. PubMed ID: 25164503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Consciousness and cognition may be mediated by multiple independent coherent ensembles.
    John ER, Easton P, Isenhart R.
    Conscious Cogn; 1997 Mar 01; 6(1):3-39; discussion 40-1, 50-5, 65-6. PubMed ID: 9170558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evidence for abstract, schematic knowledge of three spatial diagram representations.
    Novick LR, Hurley SM, Francis M.
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Mar 01; 27(2):288-308. PubMed ID: 10226439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Diagrams benefit symbolic problem-solving.
    Chu J, Rittle-Johnson B, Fyfe ER.
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2017 Jun 01; 87(2):273-287. PubMed ID: 28299771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Visual spatial representation in mathematical problem solving by deaf and hearing students.
    Blatto-Vallee G, Kelly RR, Gaustad MG, Porter J, Fonzi J.
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2007 Jun 01; 12(4):432-48. PubMed ID: 17548803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.