PubMed for Handhelds
U.S. National Library of Medicine

117 related items for PubMed ID: 18823201

  • 1. An action sequence withheld in memory can delay execution of visually guided actions: the generalization of response compatibility interference.
    Wiediger MD, Fournier LR.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1136-49. PubMed ID: 18823201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli.
    Mattson PS, Fournier LR.
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1236-47. PubMed ID: 18927040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The potentiation of two components of the reach-to-grasp action during object categorisation in visual memory.
    Derbyshire N, Ellis R, Tucker M.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 May; 122(1):74-98. PubMed ID: 16376844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Holding a manual response sequence in memory can disrupt vocal responses that share semantic features with the manual response.
    Fournier LR, Wiediger MD, McMeans R, Mattson PS, Kirkwood J, Herzog T.
    Psychol Res; 2010 Jul; 74(4):359-69. PubMed ID: 19727804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The role of selective attention in matching observed and executed actions.
    Chong TT, Cunnington R, Williams MA, Mattingley JB.
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):786-95. PubMed ID: 19124033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Automatic imitation of intransitive actions.
    Press C, Bird G, Walsh E, Heyes C.
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18077067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: no shift from dorsal to ventral control.
    Franz VH, Hesse C, Kollath S.
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1518-31. PubMed ID: 18834894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Visual and tactile integration in action comprehension and execution.
    Kritikos A, Brasch C.
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov 25; 1242():73-86. PubMed ID: 18579120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: evidence that the dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time.
    Jax SA, Rosenbaum DA.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr 25; 33(2):425-41. PubMed ID: 17469977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Modes of executive control in sequence learning: from stimulus-based to plan-based control.
    Tubau E, Hommel B, López-Moliner J.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Feb 25; 136(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 17324084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Anticipatory response control in motor sequence learning: evidence from stimulus-response compatibility.
    Koch I.
    Hum Mov Sci; 2007 Apr 25; 26(2):257-74. PubMed ID: 17346838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Memory mechanisms in grasping.
    Hesse C, Franz VH.
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May 25; 47(6):1532-45. PubMed ID: 18775734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation, and execution of actions.
    Kunde W, Koch I, Hoffmann J.
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jan 25; 57(1):87-106. PubMed ID: 14681005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Attentional limits and freedom in visually guided action.
    Enns JT, Liu G.
    Prog Brain Res; 2009 Jan 25; 176():215-26. PubMed ID: 19733759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. 10 years of illusions.
    Smeets JB, Brenner E.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec 25; 32(6):1501-4. PubMed ID: 17154790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The development of selective inhibitory control: the influence of verbal labeling.
    Kray J, Kipp KH, Karbach J.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan 25; 130(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 19084817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Object manipulation and motion perception: evidence of an influence of action planning on visual processing.
    Lindemann O, Bekkering H.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug 25; 35(4):1062-71. PubMed ID: 19653749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The costs of changing the representation of action: response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks.
    Schuch S, Koch I, Schuch S.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun 25; 30(3):566-82. PubMed ID: 15161387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Reversed effects of spatial compatibility in natural scenes.
    Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Arning K, Proctor RW.
    Am J Psychol; 2009 Jun 25; 122(3):325-36. PubMed ID: 19827702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Automatic imitation of biomechanically possible and impossible actions: effects of priming movements versus goals.
    Longo MR, Kosobud A, Bertenthal BI.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr 25; 34(2):489-501. PubMed ID: 18377184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.