PubMed for Handhelds
U.S. National Library of Medicine

250 related items for PubMed ID: 18927040

  • 1. An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli.
    Mattson PS, Fournier LR.
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1236-47. PubMed ID: 18927040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An action sequence withheld in memory can delay execution of visually guided actions: the generalization of response compatibility interference.
    Wiediger MD, Fournier LR.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1136-49. PubMed ID: 18823201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Holding a manual response sequence in memory can disrupt vocal responses that share semantic features with the manual response.
    Fournier LR, Wiediger MD, McMeans R, Mattson PS, Kirkwood J, Herzog T.
    Psychol Res; 2010 Jul; 74(4):359-69. PubMed ID: 19727804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Frequency of the first feature in action sequences influences feature binding.
    Mattson PS, Fournier LR, Behmer LP.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1446-60. PubMed ID: 22777733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: a psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow.
    Smid HG, Mulder G, Mulder LJ.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Aug; 74(2-3):169-201. PubMed ID: 2251928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of visual-verbal load and spatial compatibility on stimulus response.
    Huang WS, Hsu CC, Liu CC, Lai CH.
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Apr; 108(2):487-502. PubMed ID: 21675563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings.
    Giesen C, Frings C, Rothermund K.
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):373-87. PubMed ID: 22081277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effector identity and orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility in blindness to response-compatible stimuli.
    Nishimura A, Yokosawa K.
    Psychol Res; 2010 Mar; 74(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 19214563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention.
    Goolkasian P.
    Am J Psychol; 1997 Mar; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Hand to mouth: automatic imitation across effector systems.
    Leighton J, Heyes C.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1174-83. PubMed ID: 20731510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Reaching into cluttered visual environments: spatial and temporal influences of distracting objects.
    Meegan DV, Tipper SP.
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 May; 51(2):225-49. PubMed ID: 9621840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Anticipated action consequences as a nexus between action and perception: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Nikolaev AR, Ziessler M, Dimova K, van Leeuwen C.
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Apr; 78(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 18289769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A, Yokosawa K.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The impact of the irrelevant: the task environment modulates the impact of irrelevant features in response selection.
    Mast F, Frings C.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2198-213. PubMed ID: 25328998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fitts's law in a selective reaching task: the proximity-to-hand effect of action-centered attention revisited.
    Welsh TN, Zbinden M.
    Motor Control; 2009 Jan; 13(1):100-12. PubMed ID: 19246781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Transfer of learning in choice reactions: contributions of specific and general components of manual responses.
    Yamaguchi M, Proctor RW.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18952202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD, Hübner R.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effects of auditory and visual linguistic distractors on target localization.
    Mayer AR, Kosson DS.
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 15099147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Target selection bias transfers across different response actions.
    Moher J, Song JH.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1117-30. PubMed ID: 24490945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Processing of irrelevant location information under dual-task conditions.
    Müsseler J, Wühr P, Umiltá C.
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 16184396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.