PubMed for Handhelds
U.S. National Library of Medicine

186 related items for PubMed ID: 19261586

  • 1. An inverse belief-bias effect: more evidence for the role of inhibitory processes in logical reasoning.
    Markovits H, Saelen C, Forgues HL.
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 19261586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A curious belief-bias effect: reasoning with false premises and inhibition of real-life information.
    Markovits H, Schroyens W.
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 17341013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Reasoning under time pressure. A study of causal conditional inference.
    Evans JS, Handley SJ, Bacon AM.
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 19261582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Suppression of valid inferences and knowledge structures: the curious effect of producing alternative antecedents on reasoning with causal conditionals.
    Markovits H, Potvin F.
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Jul; 29(5):736-44. PubMed ID: 11531228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Disjunctive illusory inferences and how to eliminate them.
    Khemlani S, Johnson-Laird PN.
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jul; 37(5):615-23. PubMed ID: 19487753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reasoning with premises that are not empirically true: evidence for the role of inhibition and retrieval.
    Simoneau M, Markovits H.
    Dev Psychol; 2003 Nov; 39(6):964-75. PubMed ID: 14584978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Syllogistic reasoning time: disconfirmation disconfirmed.
    Thompson VA, Striemer CL, Reikoff R, Gunter RW, Campbell JI.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):184-9. PubMed ID: 12747506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. More evidence for a dual-process model of conditional reasoning.
    Markovits H, Forgues HL, Brunet ML.
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):736-47. PubMed ID: 22287219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Logical reasoning versus information processing in the dual-strategy model of reasoning.
    Markovits H, Brisson J, de Chantal PL.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 01; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 27176044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Processing of logically valid and logically invalid conditional inferences in discourse comprehension.
    Rader AW, Sloutsky VM.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 11827087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Counterexamples in sentential reasoning.
    Johnson-Laird PN, Hasson U.
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1105-13. PubMed ID: 14704025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Conditional reasoning with false premises facilitates the transition between familiar and abstract reasoning.
    Markovits H, Lortie-Forgues H.
    Child Dev; 2003 Oct; 82(2):646-60. PubMed ID: 21410912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The capacity to generate alternative ideas is more important than inhibition for logical reasoning in preschool-age children.
    de Chantal PL, Markovits H.
    Mem Cognit; 2017 02; 45(2):208-220. PubMed ID: 27726096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bias in conditional inference: implications for mental models and mental logic.
    Evans JS, Clibbens J, Rood B.
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Aug; 48(3):644-70. PubMed ID: 7568994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. An ERP investigation of conditional reasoning with emotional and neutral contents.
    Blanchette I, El-Deredy W.
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Nov; 91():45-53. PubMed ID: 25222293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Suppression of valid inferences: syntactic views, mental models, and relative salience.
    Chan D, Chua F.
    Cognition; 1994 Dec; 53(3):217-38. PubMed ID: 7842634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Belief-based and analytic processing in transitive inference depends on premise integration difficulty.
    Andrews G.
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Oct; 38(7):928-40. PubMed ID: 20921105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accessing distant premise information: how memory feeds reasoning.
    Lea RB, Mulligan EJ, Walton JL.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):387-395. PubMed ID: 15910126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Klauer KC, Musch J, Naumer B.
    Psychol Rev; 2000 Oct; 107(4):852-84. PubMed ID: 11089409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. How to eliminate illusions in quantified reasoning.
    Yang Y, Johnson-Laird PN.
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Sep; 28(6):1050-9. PubMed ID: 11105531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.