PubMed for Handhelds U.S. National Library of Medicine
243 related items for PubMed ID: 19487753
1. Disjunctive illusory inferences and how to eliminate them. Khemlani S, Johnson-Laird PN. Mem Cognit; 2009 Jul; 37(5):615-23. PubMed ID: 19487753 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Illusory inferences: a novel class of erroneous deductions. Johnson-Laird PN, Savary F. Cognition; 1999 Jul 30; 71(3):191-229. PubMed ID: 10476604 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How to eliminate illusions in quantified reasoning. Yang Y, Johnson-Laird PN. Mem Cognit; 2000 Sep 30; 28(6):1050-9. PubMed ID: 11105531 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The consistency of disjunctive assertions. Johnson-Laird PN, Lotstein M, Byrne RM. Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul 30; 40(5):769-78. PubMed ID: 22396128 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Illusions in quantified reasoning: how to make the impossible seem possible, and vice versa. Yang Y, Johnson-Laird PN. Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr 30; 28(3):452-65. PubMed ID: 10881562 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Illusions in modal reasoning. Goldvarg Y, Johnson-Laird PN. Mem Cognit; 2000 Mar 30; 28(2):282-94. PubMed ID: 10790982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Illusory inferences from a disjunction of conditionals: a new mental models account. Barrouillet P, Lecas JF. Cognition; 2000 Aug 14; 76(2):167-73; discussion 175-8. PubMed ID: 10856742 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Analytic Truth and Falsity of Disjunctions. Quelhas AC, Rasga C, Johnson-Laird PN. Cogn Sci; 2019 09 14; 43(9):e12739. PubMed ID: 31529532 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An inverse belief-bias effect: more evidence for the role of inhibitory processes in logical reasoning. Markovits H, Saelen C, Forgues HL. Exp Psychol; 2009 09 14; 56(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 19261586 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Counterexamples in sentential reasoning. Johnson-Laird PN, Hasson U. Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct 14; 31(7):1105-13. PubMed ID: 14704025 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Naïve deontics: a theory of meaning, representation, and reasoning. Bucciarelli M, Johnson-Laird PN. Cogn Psychol; 2005 Mar 14; 50(2):159-93. PubMed ID: 15680143 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A curious belief-bias effect: reasoning with false premises and inhibition of real-life information. Markovits H, Schroyens W. Exp Psychol; 2007 Apr 14; 54(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 17341013 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reasoning with conditionals: a test of formal models of four theories. Oberauer K. Cogn Psychol; 2006 Nov 14; 53(3):238-83. PubMed ID: 16729993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. More evidence for a dual-process model of conditional reasoning. Markovits H, Forgues HL, Brunet ML. Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul 14; 40(5):736-47. PubMed ID: 22287219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]