PubMed for Handhelds U.S. National Library of Medicine
190 related items for PubMed ID: 20042841
1. Instructiveness of real patients and simulated patients in undergraduate medical education: a randomized experiment. Bokken L, Rethans JJ, Jöbsis Q, Duvivier R, Scherpbier A, van der Vleuten C. Acad Med; 2010 Jan; 85(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 20042841 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Students' views on the use of real patients and simulated patients in undergraduate medical education. Bokken L, Rethans JJ, van Heurn L, Duvivier R, Scherpbier A, van der Vleuten C. Acad Med; 2009 Jul; 84(7):958-63. PubMed ID: 19550197 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulating the longitudinal doctor-patient relationship: experiences of simulated patients in successive consultations. Linssen T, van Dalen J, Rethans JJ. Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):873-8. PubMed ID: 17727528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Do medical students respond empathetically to a virtual patient? Deladisma AM, Cohen M, Stevens A, Wagner P, Lok B, Bernard T, Oxendine C, Schumacher L, Johnsen K, Dickerson R, Raij A, Wells R, Duerson M, Harper JG, Lind DS, Association for Surgical Education. Am J Surg; 2007 Jun; 193(6):756-60. PubMed ID: 17512291 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of virtual patients to teach medical students history taking and communication skills. Stevens A, Hernandez J, Johnsen K, Dickerson R, Raij A, Harrison C, DiPietro M, Allen B, Ferdig R, Foti S, Jackson J, Shin M, Cendan J, Watson R, Duerson M, Lok B, Cohen M, Wagner P, Lind DS. Am J Surg; 2006 Jun; 191(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 16720154 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of medical training scenarios on heart rate variability and motivation in students and simulated patients. Rieber N, Betz L, Enck P, Muth E, Nikendei C, Schrauth M, Werner A, Kowalski A, Zipfel S. Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):553-6. PubMed ID: 19493179 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of simulated patients for assessment of communication skills in undergraduate medical education in obstetrics and gynaecology. Jabeen D. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Jan; 23(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 23286617 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Students' opinions about the effects of preclinical patient contacts on their learning. Diemers AD, Dolmans DH, Verwijnen MG, Heineman E, Scherpbier AJ. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):633-47. PubMed ID: 17629786 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. When only the real thing will do: junior medical students' learning from real patients. Bell K, Boshuizen HP, Scherpbier A, Dornan T. Med Educ; 2009 Nov; 43(11):1036-43. PubMed ID: 19874495 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical students' perceptions of identity in communication skills training: a qualitative study. Vågan A. Med Educ; 2009 Mar; 43(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19250352 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance-related stress symptoms in simulated patients. Bokken L, van Dalen J, Rethans JJ. Med Educ; 2004 Oct; 38(10):1089-94. PubMed ID: 15461654 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Lecture versus standardized patient interaction in the surgical clerkship: a randomized prospective cross-over study. Carter MB, Wesley G, Larson GM. Am J Surg; 2006 Feb; 191(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 16442957 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Communication skills in standardized-patient assessment of final-year medical students: a psychometric study. Guiton G, Hodgson CS, Delandshere G, Wilkerson L. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2004 Feb; 9(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 15316269 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Teaching communication skills to medical students, a challenge in the curriculum? Deveugele M, Derese A, De Maesschalck S, Willems S, Van Driel M, De Maeseneer J. Patient Educ Couns; 2005 Sep; 58(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 16023822 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reflective teaching of medical communication skills with DiViDU: assessing the level of student reflection on recorded consultations with simulated patients. Hulsman RL, Harmsen AB, Fabriek M. Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Feb; 74(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 19062232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Strengths and weaknesses of simulated and real patients in the teaching of skills to medical students: a review. Bokken L, Rethans JJ, Scherpbier AJ, van der Vleuten CP. Simul Healthc; 2008 Feb; 3(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 19088660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Design principles for virtual patients: a focus group study among students. Huwendiek S, Reichert F, Bosse HM, de Leng BA, van der Vleuten CP, Haag M, Hoffmann GF, Tönshoff B. Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):580-8. PubMed ID: 19493183 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical students as health coaches. Wagner PJ, Jester DM, Moseley GC. Acad Med; 2002 Nov; 77(11):1164-5. PubMed ID: 12431943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient-centered interviewing and student performance in a comprehensive clinical skills examination: is there an association? Rouf E, Chumley H, Dobbie A. Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Apr; 75(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 19013743 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Instructiveness of feedback during clerkships: influence of supervisor, observation and student initiative. Van Hell EA, Kuks JB, Raat AN, Van Lohuizen MT, Cohen-Schotanus J. Med Teach; 2009 Jan; 31(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 18825544 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]