PubMed for Handhelds
U.S. National Library of Medicine

98 related items for PubMed ID: 20584420

  • 1. The theoretical indispensability of concepts.
    Weiskopf DA.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):228-9. PubMed ID: 20584420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Concepts are a functional kind.
    Lalumera E.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):217-8. PubMed ID: 20584409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Where are nature's joints? Finding the mechanisms underlying categorization.
    Markman AB.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):220-1. PubMed ID: 20584412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. PrĂ©cis of doing without concepts.
    Machery E.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):195-206; discussion 206-44. PubMed ID: 20584396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evidence of coordination as a cure for concept eliminativism.
    Scarantino A.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):223-4. PubMed ID: 20584415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Concepts and theoretical unification.
    Margolis E, Laurence S.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):219-20. PubMed ID: 20584411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Banishing the thought.
    Strohminger N, Moore BW.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):225-6. PubMed ID: 20584417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Why don't concepts constitute a natural kind?
    Samuels R, Ferreira M.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):222-3. PubMed ID: 20584414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Are prototypes and exemplars used in distinct cognitive processes?
    Virtel J, Piccinini G.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):226-7. PubMed ID: 20584418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Eliminating the "concept" concept.
    Harnad S.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):213-4. PubMed ID: 20584404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Unity amidst heterogeneity in theories of concepts.
    Edwards K.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):210-1. PubMed ID: 20584401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mental imagery as the adaptationist views it.
    Pani JR.
    Conscious Cogn; 1996 Sep; 5(3):288-326. PubMed ID: 8906405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Defending the concept of "concepts".
    Hayes BK, Kearney L.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):214. PubMed ID: 20584405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Doing with development: moving toward a complete theory of concepts.
    Vlach HA, Krogh L, Thom EE, Sandhofer CM.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):227-8. PubMed ID: 20584419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Not different kinds, just special cases.
    Danks D.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):208-9. PubMed ID: 20584399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The faux, fake, forged, false, fabricated, and phony: problems for the independence of similarity-based theories of concepts.
    Jacobson AJ.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):215. PubMed ID: 20584407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The function and representation of concepts.
    Khemlani SS, Goodwin G.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):216-7. PubMed ID: 20584408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. From conceptual representations to explanatory relations.
    Lombrozo T.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):218-9. PubMed ID: 20584410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. 100 years of psychology of concepts: the theoretical notion of concept and its operationalization.
    Machery E.
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2007 Mar; 38(1):63-84. PubMed ID: 17324809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Hybrid vigor and conceptual structure.
    Keil F.
    Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):215-6. PubMed ID: 20584406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.