PubMed for Handhelds
U.S. National Library of Medicine

459 related items for PubMed ID: 23472958

  • 1. Influence of phonotactic probability/neighbourhood density on lexical learning in late talkers.
    MacRoy-Higgins M, Schwartz RG, Shafer VL, Marton K.
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; ; 48(2):188-99. PubMed ID: 23472958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The Influence of Phonotactic Probability on Nonword Repetition and Fast Mapping in 3-Year-Olds With a History of Expressive Language Delay.
    MacRoy-Higgins M, Dalton KP.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 58(6):1773-9. PubMed ID: 26540310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Attention and word learning in toddlers who are late talkers.
    Macroy-Higgins M, Montemarano EA.
    J Child Lang; 2016 09; 43(5):1020-37. PubMed ID: 27464621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Differentiating the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on vocabulary comprehension and production: a comparison of preschool children with versus without phonological delays.
    Storkel HL, Maekawa J, Hoover JR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 53(4):933-49. PubMed ID: 20543024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Word learning by preschoolers with SLI: effect of phonotactic probability and object familiarity.
    Gray S, Brinkley S, Svetina D.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1289-300. PubMed ID: 22411280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Novel word learning: An eye-tracking study. Are 18-month-old late talkers really different from their typical peers?
    Ellis EM, Borovsky A, Elman JL, Evans JL.
    J Commun Disord; 2012 Oct; 58():143-57. PubMed ID: 26188415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Responses made by late talkers and typically developing toddlers during speech assessments.
    Hodges R, Baker E, Munro N, McGregor KK.
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2017 12; 19(6):587-600. PubMed ID: 27701903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The emerging lexicon of children with phonological delays: phonotactic constraints and probability in acquisition.
    Storkel HL.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):1194-212. PubMed ID: 15603471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The sensitivity of children with SLI to phonotactic probabilities during lexical access.
    Quémart P, Maillart C.
    J Commun Disord; 2004 Oct; 61():48-59. PubMed ID: 27023739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Learning new words: phonotactic probability in language development.
    Storkel HL.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 44(6):1321-37. PubMed ID: 11776368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Prosodic and lexical aspects of maternal linguistic input to late-talking toddlers.
    D'Odorico L, Jacob V.
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2001 Dec; 41(3):293-311. PubMed ID: 16702095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Phonological and lexical effects in verbal recall by children with specific language impairments.
    Coady JA, Mainela-Arnold E, Evans JL.
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2001 Dec; 48(2):144-59. PubMed ID: 23472955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Lexical and phonological effects in early word production.
    Sosa AV, Stoel-Gammon C.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 55(2):596-608. PubMed ID: 22207699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effect of incremental changes in phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children.
    Storkel HL, Bontempo DE, Aschenbrenner AJ, Maekawa J, Lee SY.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1689-700. PubMed ID: 23882005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Triggering word learning in children with Language Impairment: the effect of phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density.
    McKean C, Letts C, Howard D.
    J Child Lang; 2014 Nov; 41(6):1224-48. PubMed ID: 24191951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Word learning by children with phonological delays: differentiating effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density.
    Storkel HL, Hoover JR.
    J Commun Disord; 2014 Nov; 43(2):105-19. PubMed ID: 20004908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fast mapping and word learning by preschoolers with specific language impairment in a supported learning context: effect of encoding cues, phonotactic probability, and object familiarity.
    Gray S, Brinkley S.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):870-84. PubMed ID: 20966382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Not Only Size Matters: Early-Talker and Late-Talker Vocabularies Support Different Word-Learning Biases in Babies and Networks.
    Colunga E, Sims CE.
    Cogn Sci; 2017 02; 41 Suppl 1():73-95. PubMed ID: 27873349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The Monosyllable Imitation Test for Toddlers: influence of stimulus characteristics on imitation, compliance and diagnostic accuracy.
    Hodges R, Munro N, Baker E, McGregor K, Heard R.
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2017 01; 52(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 27075113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. What can Neighbourhood Density effects tell us about word learning? Insights from a connectionist model of vocabulary development.
    Takac M, Knott A, Stokes S.
    J Child Lang; 2017 Mar; 44(2):346-379. PubMed ID: 26884360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.