PubMed for Handhelds
U.S. National Library of Medicine

332 related items for PubMed ID: 23724703

  • 1. Corralling the ingroup: deviant derogation and perception of group variability.
    Hutchison P, Abrams D, De Moura GR.
    J Soc Psychol; ; 153(3):334-50. PubMed ID: 23724703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Justice reactions to deviant ingroup members: Ingroup identity threat motivates utilitarian punishments.
    Fousiani K, Yzerbyt V, Kteily NS, Demoulin S.
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2019 Oct; 58(4):869-893. PubMed ID: 30648270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing.
    Sullivan D, Landau MJ, Branscombe NR, Rothschild ZK.
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Apr; 102(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 22229457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Reactions to ingroup and outgroup deviants: an experimental group paradigm for black sheep effect.
    Rullo M, Presaghi F, Livi S.
    PLoS One; 2015 Apr; 10(5):e0125605. PubMed ID: 25946148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluations of and reasoning about normative and deviant ingroup and outgroup members: development of the black sheep effect.
    Abrams D, Palmer SB, Rutland A, Cameron L, Van de Vyver J.
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Jan; 50(1):258-70. PubMed ID: 23544855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Protecting the ingroup stereotype: ingroup identification and the management of deviant ingroup members.
    Castano E, Paladino MP, Coull A, Yzerbyt VY.
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2002 Sep; 41(Pt 3):365-85. PubMed ID: 12419008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Perceived entitativity and the black-sheep effect: when will we denigrate negative ingroup members?
    Lewis AC, Sherman SJ.
    J Soc Psychol; 2002 Sep; 150(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 20397595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of mortality salience on evaluation of ingroup and outgroup sources: the impact of pro- versus counterattitudinal positions.
    See YH, Petty RE.
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Mar; 32(3):405-16. PubMed ID: 16455866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Behavioral immune system and ingroup derogation: the effects of infectious diseases on ingroup derogation attitudes.
    Wu Q, Tan C, Wang B, Zhou P.
    PLoS One; 2015 Mar; 10(3):e0122794. PubMed ID: 25816247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Why do people perceive ingroup homogeneity on ingroup traits and outgroup homogeneity on outgroup traits?
    Rubin M, Badea C.
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Jan; 33(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 17178928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The black sheep effect: The case of the deviant ingroup robot.
    Steain A, Stanton CJ, Stevens CJ.
    PLoS One; 2019 Jan; 14(10):e0222975. PubMed ID: 31618216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Responses to endorsement of commonality by ingroup and outgroup members: the roles of group representation and threat.
    Gómez Á, Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL, Fernández S, Vázquez A.
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Apr; 39(4):419-31. PubMed ID: 23456560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Exclusion as self-protection: the function of subtypes for ingroup members.
    Parks-Stamm EJ.
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 May; 39(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 23471318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Coalition or derogation? How perceived discrimination influences intraminority intergroup relations.
    Craig MA, Richeson JA.
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Apr; 102(4):759-77. PubMed ID: 22141393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Membership status and subjective group dynamics: who triggers the black sheep effect?
    Pinto IR, Marques JM, Levine JM, Abrams D.
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Jul; 99(1):107-19. PubMed ID: 20565188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Our flaws are more human than yours: ingroup bias in humanizing negative characteristics.
    Koval P, Laham SM, Haslam N, Bastian B, Whelan JA.
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Mar; 38(3):283-95. PubMed ID: 21940854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Striving for success in outgroup settings: effects of contextually emphasizing ingroup dimensions on stigmatized group members' social identity and performance styles.
    Derks B, van Laar C, Ellemers N.
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 May; 32(5):576-88. PubMed ID: 16702152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Shared identity is key to effective communication.
    Greenaway KH, Wright RG, Willingham J, Reynolds KJ, Haslam SA.
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Feb; 41(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 25416042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Protecting threatened identity: sticking with the group by emphasizing ingroup heterogeneity.
    Hutchison P, Jetten J, Christian J, Haycraft E.
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1620-32. PubMed ID: 17122175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Implicit ingroup metafavoritism: subtle preference for ingroup members displaying ingroup bias.
    Castelli L, Tomelleri S, Zogmaister C.
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):807-18. PubMed ID: 18359956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.