PubMed for Handhelds
U.S. National Library of Medicine

190 related items for PubMed ID: 28840393

  • 1. A matter of you versus me? Experiences of control in a joint go/no-go task.
    van der Weiden A, Liepelt R, van Haren NEM.
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):842-851. PubMed ID: 28840393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.
    Klempova B, Liepelt R.
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):449-63. PubMed ID: 25833374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Attention allocation and task representation during joint action planning.
    Kourtis D, Knoblich G, Woźniak M, Sebanz N.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 26(10):2275-86. PubMed ID: 24702448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. How preschoolers and adults represent their joint action partner's behavior.
    Sacheli LM, Meyer M, Hartstra E, Bekkering H, Hunnius S.
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):863-877. PubMed ID: 29067520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Predictive representation of other people's actions in joint action planning: an EEG study.
    Kourtis D, Sebanz N, Knoblich G.
    Soc Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 8(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 22671131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Individual differences in action co-representation: not personal distress or subclinical psychotic experiences but sex composition modulates joint action performance.
    van der Weiden A, Aarts H, Prikken M, van Haren NE.
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 234(2):499-510. PubMed ID: 26525711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Our actions in my mind: motor imagery of joint action.
    Vesper C, Knoblich G, Sebanz N.
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Mar; 55():115-21. PubMed ID: 23751170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Priority for one's own stimulus in joint performance: evidence from an event-related potential study.
    Kato K, Yoshizaki K, Kimura Y.
    Neuroreport; 2016 05 25; 27(8):564-7. PubMed ID: 27043796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Joint action goals reduce visuomotor interference effects from a partner's incongruent actions.
    Clarke S, McEllin L, Francová A, Székely M, Butterfill SA, Michael J.
    Sci Rep; 2019 10 28; 9(1):15414. PubMed ID: 31659223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Keys and seats: Spatial response coding underlying the joint spatial compatibility effect.
    Dittrich K, Dolk T, Rothe-Wulf A, Klauer KC, Prinz W.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov 28; 75(8):1725-36. PubMed ID: 23896690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Group membership affects spontaneous mental representation: failure to represent the out-group in a joint action task.
    McClung JS, Jentzsch I, Reicher SD.
    PLoS One; 2013 Nov 28; 8(11):e79178. PubMed ID: 24278119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Social categorization and cooperation in motor joint action: evidence for a joint end-state comfort.
    Dötsch D, Schubö A.
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Aug 28; 233(8):2323-34. PubMed ID: 25963752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The predictability of a partner's actions modulates the sense of joint agency.
    Bolt NK, Loehr JD.
    Cognition; 2017 04 28; 161():60-65. PubMed ID: 28110236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Reciprocal information flow and role distribution support joint action coordination.
    Curioni A, Vesper C, Knoblich G, Sebanz N.
    Cognition; 2019 06 28; 187():21-31. PubMed ID: 30797991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Perspective taking eliminates differences in co-representation of out-group members' actions.
    Müller BC, Kühn S, van Baaren RB, Dotsch R, Brass M, Dijksterhuis A.
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun 28; 211(3-4):423-8. PubMed ID: 21465413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Inverting the joint Simon effect by intention.
    Kiernan D, Ray M, Welsh TN.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct 28; 19(5):914-20. PubMed ID: 22718258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The influence of the Japanese waving cat on the joint spatial compatibility effect: A replication and extension of Dolk, Hommel, Prinz, and Liepelt (2013).
    Puffe L, Dittrich K, Klauer KC.
    PLoS One; 2017 Oct 28; 12(9):e0184844. PubMed ID: 28910413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Rationality in Joint Action: Maximizing Coefficiency in Coordination.
    Török G, Pomiechowska B, Csibra G, Sebanz N.
    Psychol Sci; 2019 06 28; 30(6):930-941. PubMed ID: 31088200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Autistic traits affect interpersonal motor coordination by modulating strategic use of role-based behavior.
    Curioni A, Minio-Paluello I, Sacheli LM, Candidi M, Aglioti SM.
    Mol Autism; 2017 06 28; 8():23. PubMed ID: 28616126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. My partner is also on my mind: social context modulates the N1 response.
    Baess P, Prinz W.
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jan 28; 233(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 25224703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.