These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Fracture strength of 5 different all-ceramic crown systems.
    Author: Strub JR, Beschnidt SM.
    Journal: Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 10023224.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of 5 different all-ceramic crown systems (In-Ceram, Empress staining technique, Empress veneering technique, Celay feldspathic system, and Celay In-Ceram system) before and after cyclic preloading in an artificial mouth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Extracted natural maxillary incisors were prepared with a 90-degree shoulder. The crowns were adhesively luted to the abutments using dual-cured composite cement. Half of the specimens were artificially aged via a chewing simulation and thermocycling, and all specimens were tested for fracture strength. The results were compared with those of porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crowns with circular porcelain-butt margins that were cemented with zinc phosphate cement. RESULTS: The chewing simulation and the thermocycling significantly decreased the fracture strength of all tested crown systems (P < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the all-ceramic crown groups and the PFM crowns. CONCLUSION: All-ceramic crowns can be used for anterior restorations. However, in vivo investigations of all-ceramic crown systems should be undertaken before introducing them into routine clinical use.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]