These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Anorectal functions in patients with spinal cord injury.
    Author: Greving I, Tegenthoff M, Nedjat S, Orth G, Bötel U, Meister V, Micklefield G, May B, Enck P.
    Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil; 1998 Dec; 10(6):509-15. PubMed ID: 10050256.
    Abstract:
    We wished to establish anorectal functions in patients with spinal cord lesions, related to the level of lesion and its completeness. We also wished to determine the value of neurophysiological tests for completeness of transsections in comparison with manometry and visceral sensory testing. In 32 patients (31.5 +/- 14.1 years, 25 males) with spinal trauma, completeness of transsection was assessed clinically. In 16 of these patients (30 +/- 15.6 years, nine males), a neurological work-up included recording of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEP) from the pudendal nerve within the first week after trauma. Also, anal sphincter EMG and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) were assessed. All patients also underwent conventional anorectal manometry and visceral sensory testing. Of all 32 patients, 15 were judged as 'complete' based on their clinical signs. Of those 16 tested neurologically, seven were labelled 'complete' since no MEP or SEP were detectable; one had pudendal SEP and MEP present, while SEP were present but delayed (47.0 +/- 8.8 msec) in the remaining patients. In four of these patients, also MEP were recorded (27.9 +/- 5.2 msec) and normal. PNTML was present in 12/16 patients independent of the completeness of lesion, and was rated normal in nine and delayed in three patients. EMG was normal in five, and pathological in 11 cases. In 5/15 cases of those judged as 'complete' (in 3/7 evaluated neurologically), visceral sensory testing revealed a minimal threshold for rectal perception of distension of 44 mL (range: 10-130), which sometimes was also perceived as urge to defecate. In a further case, manometry showed major voluntary action of the anal sphincter. These patients had lesions at all levels of the spinal column, ranging from cervical (C4,C6,C7) via thoratical (2 x T7,T8,T12) to lumbar segments. Anorectal function testing, and specifically visceral sensory testing may be superior to neurological assessment of 'completeness' of spinal cord lesions. It may be that visceral afferent pathways others than spinothalamic tract are involved in rectal perception that are less accessible to conventional neurophysiological diagnostic work-up.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]