These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Peritonitis in diverticulitis: the Bern concept].
    Author: Seiler CA, Brügger L, Maurer CA, Renzulli P, Büchler MW.
    Journal: Zentralbl Chir; 1998; 123(12):1394-9. PubMed ID: 10063552.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: The colon is the most frequent origine for a diffuse peritonitis and diverticular perforation is again the most common source of a spontaneous secondary peritonitis. This paper first focuses on the treatment of peritonitis and secondly on the strategies of source control in peritonitis with special emphasis on the tactics (primary anastomosis vs. Hartmann procedure with colostomy) for surgical source control. PATIENT AND METHODS: Prospective analysis of 404 patients suffering from peritonitis (11/93-2/98), treated with an uniform treatment concept including early operation, source control and extensive intraoperative lavage (20 to 30 liters) as a standard procedure. Other treatment measures were added in special indications "on demand" only. Peritonitis was graded with the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI). Tactics of source control in peritonitis due to diverticulitis were performed according to "general condition" respectively the MPI of the patient. RESULTS: The 404 patients averaged a MPI of 19 (0-35) in "local" peritonitis and a MPI of 26 (11-43) in "diffuse" peritonitis. The colon as a source of peritonitis resulted in MPI of 16 (0-33) in the case of "local" respectively 27 (11-43) in "diffuse" peritonitis. From 181 patients suffering from diverticulitis 144 needed an operation and in 78 (54%) peritonitis was present. Fourty-six percent (36) of the patients suffered from "local", 54% (42) from "diffuse" peritonitis. Resection with primary anastomosis was performed in 26% (20/78) whereas in 74% (58/78) of the patients a Hartmann procedure with colostomy was performed. The correlating MPI was 16 (0-28) vs. 23 (16-27) respectively. The analysis of complications and mortality based on the MPI showed a decent discrimination potential for primary anastomosis vs Hartmann procedure: morbidity 35% vs. 41%; reoperation 5% vs. 5%; mortality 0% vs. 14%. CONCLUSION: In case of peritonitis due to diverticulitis the treatment of peritonitis comes first. Thanks to advances in intensive care and improved anti-inflammatory care, a more conservative surgical concept nowadays is accepted. In the case of diverticulitis the MPI is helpful to choose between primary anastomosis vs. Hartmann procedure with colostomy as source control. The MPI includes the "general condition" of the patient into the tactical decision how to attain source control.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]