These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Anesthetic modulation of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury in pigs: comparison between halothane and sevoflurane.
    Author: Conradie S, Coetzee A, Coetzee J.
    Journal: Can J Anaesth; 1999 Jan; 46(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 10078408.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Halothane offers protection against the reperfusion injury of the myocardium. This study compared sevoflurane with halothane in its potential to modulate the effects of acute severe ischemia and reperfusion on the myocardium. METHODS: Experiments were conducted on 25 pigs. Anesthesia consisted of thiopental, vecuronium and fentanyl. The lungs were mechanically ventilated with oxygen and nitrogen. Animals were randomly allocated to receive either I MAC halothane or sevoflurane. A control group received fentanyl and pentobarbital. Regional myocardial function was measured with sonomicrometers. The left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded for 15 min followed by 60 min reperfusion. RESULTS: Neither halothane nor sevoflurane protected the heart against the effects of acute and severe regional myocardial ischemia. During reperfusion, 89% of the animals receiving sevoflurane suffered from ventricular fibrillation compared with 30% in the halothane group (P < 0.005). Five minutes into the reperfusion period the animals subjected to halothane anesthesia demonstrated an 88% recovery in regional myocardial systolic function while in the sevoflurane group the recovery was 40% of pre-ischemic control (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Halothane is associated with less reperfusion arrhythmias and, in addition, recovery of regional myocardial function during reperfusion was more rapid in the presence of halothane than with sevoflurane.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]