These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Laboratory and clinical evaluation of the impact Uni-Vent 750 portable ventilator.
    Author: Campbell RS, Davis K, Johnson DJ, Porembka D, Hurst JM.
    Journal: Respir Care; 1992 Jan; 37(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 10145579.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Transportation of critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients from intensive care units for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures has become common in the last decade. Maintenance of adequate oxygenation and ventilation during transport is essential. We evaluated the Impact Uni-Vent 750 portable ventilator in the laboratory and in the clinical arena to determine its usefulness during inhospital transport. MATERIALS & METHODS: In the laboratory, we determined the Uni-Vent 750's ability to assure tidal volume (VT) delivery in the face of decreasing compliance of a test lung and tested the alarm systems. Using a two-compartment lung model modified to simulate spontaneous breathing, we also evaluated the responsiveness of the demand valve. The clinical evaluation was accomplished by comparing arterial blood gas values and ventilator settings in the intensive care unit before transport to those during transport. RESULTS: As lung compliance was reduced from 0.1 to 0.02 mL/cm H2O [1.0 to 0.20 L/kPa], a slight, statistically insignificant decrease in delivered tidal volume was observed. All alarm systems operated according to manufacturer's specifications. The demand valve triggered appropriately with PEEP from 0 to 20 cm H2O [0 to 1.96 kPa]. Sensitivity settings less than -6 cm H2O [-0.59 kPa] sometimes resulted in inability to trigger the demand valve. During patient transport, arterial blood gas values and ventilator settings were comparable to those observed in the ICU. Because an FIO2 of 1.0 was used during transport, mean (SD) PaO2 was significantly greater 89 (26) vs 341 (78) [11.8 (3.5) vs 45.3 (10.4) kPa]. CONCLUSIONS: The Uni-Vent 750 is a reliable transport ventilator, capable of maintaining adequate oxygenation and ventilation in a majority of mechanically ventilated patients. The Uni-Vent 750's ability to (1) provide CMV, AMV, and SIMV; (2) provide low and high pressure alarms; and (3) provide PEEP compensation is unique among portable ventilators.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]