These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: CFC replacements: safety testing, approval for use in metered dose inhalers.
    Author: Graepel P, Alexander DJ.
    Journal: J Aerosol Med; 1991; 4(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 10147679.
    Abstract:
    HFA-134a and HFA-227 (chlorine free hydrofluoro-alkanes) are at present in extensive nonclinical safety testing sponsored by two joint research consortia (IPACT-I, IPACT-II) of companies interested in metered dose inhalers (MDI). The rationale for toxicity testing of these CFC replacements is to predict safety of their use as drug propellants in MDI. Frequency of use, intervals and systemic exposure levels are key parameters. Intact animals and in-vitro systems repeatedly exposed to multiples of patient doses, under conditions comparable to human administration should not show adverse reactions. With an emphasis different from non-U.S. Health Authorities, the U.S. FDA insists on proof of toxic effects which may require excessive doses. This principle is questioned for essentially inert gases such as CFCs and HFA-134a and HFA-227 which only through the effects of oxygen deprivation at unreasonably high concentrations of the inhaled propellant/air mixture indirectly cause mild toxic effects in animals. Provided that no intrinsic toxic effects will be detected, chances are good that these CFC replacements will eventually be approved. In view of the estimated 5-year testing time frame and the risks involved, CFCs should remain available for MDI for some time in the future.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]