These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Outcome-based justification for implementing new point-of-care tests: there is no difference between magnesium replacement based on ionized magnesium and total magnesium as a predictor of development of arrhythmias in the postoperative cardiac surgical patient.
    Author: Steinberger HA, Hanson CW.
    Journal: Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1998; 12(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 10178713.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To determine whether introducing a new laboratory test, ionized magnesium (iMg++), would affect outcome, where outcome was defined as the rate of arrhythmias in a population of postoperative cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) patients. DESIGN: A prospective randomized trial. SETTING: Cardiothoracic surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty consecutive post-CPB patients with randomized to two groups, one of which received routine reporting of iMg++ levels on all postoperative electrolyte requests while the other had access to total magnesium (tMg++) levels on demand and no access to iMg++ levels. Groups were compared for rate of arrhythmias, total amount of magnesium repleted, and demographics. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were randomized to the tMg++ group and 65 to the iMg++ group. The two groups did not differ in the rate of arrhythmias (chi-square test): 13/85 (15%) of the tMg++ patients and 12/65 (18%) of the iMg++ patients developed an arrhythmia. The groups also did not differ in the amount of magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) administered (2 tailed t-test): tMg++ patients received 1.5 +/- 0.15 (SEM) gm of MgSO4, whereas iMg++ patients received 1.3 +/- 0.15 gm. CONCLUSION: The study does not support the hypothesis that magnesium repletion titrated to iMg++ reduces arrhythmia development in post-CPB patients. The lack of a difference in the amount of magnesium replacement between the two groups suggests that tMg++ level is a reasonable indicator of iMg++ level. Routine measurement of iMg++ does not, therefore, appear to have advantages over tMg++ in the postoperative management of CPB patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]