These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cutaneous melanoma histologically associated with a nevus and melanoma de novo have a different profile of risk: results from a case-control study.
    Author: Carli P, Massi D, Santucci M, Biggeri A, Giannotti B.
    Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol; 1999 Apr; 40(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 10188672.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Histopathologic association between melanocytic nevus and melanoma has been reported in approximately 10% to more than 50% of melanoma cases. Whether melanomas in contiguity with a nevus have a different natural history and pathogenesis from melanomas without a nevus is still to be determined. OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to clarify whether melanocytic nevus-associated melanomas (MN[+]) have a different risk factor profile from cases without histopathologic evidence of melanocytic nevus association (MN[-]). METHODS: The study population consisted of 131 invasive melanoma cases with a thickness of 4.00 mm or less and 174 control cases without melanomas. The whole series was evaluated for the following risk factors: phenotypic traits; the number of common, atypical, and congenital nevus-like nevi; and freckling and history of sunburns. Melanoma cases were revised for the presence of associated melanocytic nevi. The analysis of risk factors was performed by a case-control approach comparing cases, classified by histologic association with nevus, to the group of controls. Possible differences in risk factor distribution between MN(+) cases and MN(-) cases were evaluated with a polychotomous logistic regression model and a likelihood ratio test for heterogeneity. RESULTS: Histopathologic association between melanocytic nevus and melanoma was found in 27 cases (20.6%). Phenotypic traits were shown to be more powerful predictors of risk for MN(-) than for MN(+) cases (blond/red hair; odds ratio, 7.4 and 1.2, respectively; likelihood ratio test for heterogeneity, 4.13; P < .05). Conversely, history of frequent sunburn was a risk factor only in MN(+) cases (more than 5 sunburns; odds ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-33.7), but not in MN(-) cases (odds ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-4.0; likelihood ratio test for heterogeneity, 4.2; P < .05). Where melanocytic nevi are concerned, an increased number of common nevi was a predictor of melanoma risk in both MN(+) and MN(-) cases, but with a different magnitude of risk, higher for MN(+) cases (number of common nevi, 10-30; odds ratio, 14.4 and 4.7, respectively; likelihood ratio test for heterogeneity, 3.7; P = .055). CONCLUSION: This study showed that, although MN(+) and MN(-) melanomas share many risk factors, there is a different strength of association between the 2 groups. The effect of a history of sunburn as a predictor of risk was found only for nevus-associated melanomas, suggesting a possible role of sunburns in the neoplastic transformation of nevi.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]