These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Reproducible scoring of CFU-GM and BFU-E grown in collagen-based semisolid medium after a short (3 h) training.
    Author: Dobo I, Bidet JM, Acquart S, Allegraud A, Amiot L, Boccaccio C, Boiret N, Domenech J, Mossuz P, Sensebe L, Wunder E, Zandecki M, Hermouet S.
    Journal: J Hematother; 1999 Feb; 8(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 10192301.
    Abstract:
    Colony counting remains an important source of variation in colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) assays performed in methylcellulose or agar. We studied the reliability of colony scoring of CFU-GM assays carried out with collagen, a matrix that allows gel collection on glass slides and in situ cellular morphology. Fourteen slides were exchanged among laboratories, and two rounds of colony (CFU-GM and burst-forming units-erythrocyte [BFU-E]) counting were performed by 11 (first counting), then 8 (second counting) different laboratories, the majority of which had no previous experience of collagen gel cultures and reading. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the first round of colony counting showed significant differences among centers in CFU-GM counts (p = 0.023) but not in BFU-E counts (p = 0.163). Coefficients of variation for the 14 slides ranged from 22% to 50% (median 28%) for CFU-GM counts and from 12% to 74% (median 23%) for BFU-E counts. After a 3 h session of collective colony reading attended by members of 8 laboratories, a second round of colony counting was performed. This time, ANOVA showed no significant difference among centers for CFU-GM (p = 0.533) and BFU-E (p = 0.328) counts, and coefficients of variation were significantly improved, with medians of 17% for CFU-GM counts and 20% for BFU-E counts. In addition, when data from the second round of readings were analyzed without the 2 centers counting consistently low (center 8) or consistently high (center 5), variance among centers was further improved for both CFU-GM (p = 0.798) and BFU-E (p = 0.619). In summary, this study shows for the first time that reproducible BFU-E and CFU-GM scoring can be achieved using collagen-based semisolid medium (now commercially available) as long as adequate training in colony identification is provided.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]