These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Blood flow-metabolism imaging with positron emission tomography in patients with diabetes mellitus for the assessment of reversible left ventricular contractile dysfunction.
    Author: Schöder H, Campisi R, Ohtake T, Hoh CK, Moon DH, Czernin J, Schelbert HR.
    Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Apr; 33(5):1328-37. PubMed ID: 10193735.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) blood flow-F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography accurately predicts the postrevascularization improvement in left ventricular dysfunction in unselected patients with CAD. In diabetic patients, however, poor myocardial glucose utilization may limit the accuracy of the approach. METHODS: Forty patients (64+/-10 years old; 19 with DM = group I; 21 without DM = group II) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF = 29+/-6%) were studied with N-13 ammonia and FDG PET before coronary revascularization. Studies were performed after intravenous injection of regular insulin (group I) or oral glucose administration (group II). Blood flow-FDG mismatches and matches were identified by polar map analysis in the three vascular territories of the left anterior descending, left circumflex and right coronary artery. Wall motion and LVEF were assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography before and 158+/-123 days after revascularization. RESULTS: Of 107 vascular territories analyzed, 46 were classified as mismatch, 29 as match and 32 as normal. The FDG image quality, assessed by F-18 myocardium to blood pool activity ratios, and the predictive accuracy were similar in both groups; presence of a blood flow/FDG mismatch had a sensitivity of 92% (group I) and 94% (group II) and a specificity of 85% (group I) and 79% (group II) for an improvement in regional left ventricular function. A postrevascularization improvement in global left ventricular function was related to the extent of blood flow/FDG mismatch; LVEF increased from 30+/-7% to 35+/-7% (p = 0.017) in patients with one mismatch and from 27+/-4% to 41+/-7% (p < 0.001) in those with two mismatches. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive accuracy of blood flow/FDG imaging is maintained in patients with DM when a clinically acceptable study protocol, which guarantees good FDG image quality, is used. The extent of a blood flow/metabolism mismatch is correlated with the magnitude of the postrevascularization improvement in global left ventricular function.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]