These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Users' understanding of the lactational amenorrhea method and the occurrence of pregnancy.
    Author: Kennedy KI, Kotelchuck M, Visness CM, Kazi A, Ramos R.
    Journal: J Hum Lact; 1998 Sep; 14(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 10205433.
    Abstract:
    It is unknown whether a user's understanding of the Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM) is related to its successful use. A study of 876 LAM users in Pakistan and the Philippines collected information about women's understanding of LAM. The present analysis aims to determine: (1) the proportion of LAM users who understand the method, (2) whether any known factors can distinguish those who understand LAM from those who do not, and (3) whether an understanding of LAM is related to subsequent pregnancy. Over 75% of LAM users could consistently recite the LAM guidelines correctly for a full year postpartum. However, 38% of users failed to display, at least once, an understanding of LAM during the first year postpartum mainly by failing to abstain, to use another method or to explain their nonuse of another method when their LAM protection expired. LAM understanding generally could not be predicted by sociodemographic factors. The occurrence of pregnancy during the first year postpartum was not related to LAM understanding, regardless of how LAM understanding was defined, nor could it be predicted by any other measured characteristic of the users. This study aims to determine 1) the proportion of lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) users who understand the method; 2) whether any known factors can distinguish those who understand LAM from those who do not; and 3) whether an understanding of LAM is related to subsequent pregnancy. Data were collected from 876 LAM users in Pakistan and the Philippines. It was found that 75% of LAM users could consistently recite the LAM guidelines correctly for a full year postpartum. However, 38% of users failed to display, at least once, an understanding of LAM during the first year postpartum mainly by failing to abstain, to use another method or to explain their nonuse of another method when their LAM protection expired. Also, the sociodemographic factors could not predict the level of understanding of LAM users. Therefore, the occurrence of pregnancy during the first year postpartum was not related to LAM understanding, regardless of how LAM understanding was defined, nor could it be predicted by any other measured characteristics of the users.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]