These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Dry versus conventional laser imagers: film properties and image quality. Author: Gahleitner A, Kreuzer S, Schick S, Nowotny R, Breitenseher M, Solar P, Czerny C, Lang T, Imhof H. Journal: Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):871-5. PubMed ID: 10207495. Abstract: The authors compared image quality and stability with a dry laser imager versus a conventional wet laser imager. Hard copies of 56 magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomographic studies were analyzed for gray-scale distribution and temperature stability. Results with the dry laser imager did not reach the quality of results with a wet laser imager, but the performance and ecologic criteria were sufficient to make use of this technique advantageous.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]