These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Comparison of a D-dimer rapid-test with a plasma-immunoassay for diagnosis of venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in a medical emergency unit].
    Author: Stey C, Steurer J, Fehr J.
    Journal: Praxis (Bern 1994); 1999 Mar 11; 88(11):463-70. PubMed ID: 10218425.
    Abstract:
    The level of D-dimer in the blood reflects the level of lysed, cross-linked fibrin, and is useful in the diagnosis of clinically suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. We compared two assays for the measurement of D-dimer levels, the whole-blood immunoassay SimpliRED which can be performed in two minutes, and the plasma immunoassay NycoCard. D-dimer levels were determined with these two techniques in 100 patients. With clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis and positive D-dimer levels a compression ultrasonography using a colour coded Duplex instrument, or a phlebography were done. For clinically suspected pulmonary embolism a ventilation/perfusion scan was done in patients with normal x-ray. Patients with radiographic abnormalities were investigated with spiral computed tomography or pulmonary arteriography. When both assays showed negative results a diagnostic procedure was only done if there was a high clinical suspicion for thromboembolism. Both assays showed a correct positive result in seven of the eight diagnosed thromboembolic events and one false negative result each. The SimpliRED assay exhibited a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 61%, the negative predictive value was 98.3%, positive predictive value 15.9%. The NycoCard assay displayed also a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity was lower with 39.6%, the negative predictive value was 97.4%, positive predictive value 10.7%. The SimpliRED assay can be a valuable tool when laboratory facilities for a plasma immunoassay are not accessible. The negative predictive value is very high, therefore this test is considered to be helpful for excluding a thromboembolic event.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]