These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The effects of rifampin and rifabutin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a combination oral contraceptive.
    Author: Barditch-Crovo P, Trapnell CB, Ette E, Zacur HA, Coresh J, Rocco LE, Hendrix CW, Flexner C.
    Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1999 Apr; 65(4):428-38. PubMed ID: 10223781.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Rifampin (INN, rifampicin), a CYP34A inducer, results in significant interactions when coadministered with combination oral contraceptives that contain norethindrone (INN, norethisterone) and ethinyl estradiol (INN, ethinylestradiol). Little is known about the effects of rifabutin, a related rifamycin. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The relative effects of rifampin and rifabutin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone were evaluated in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded crossover study in 12 premenopausal women who were on a stable oral contraceptive regimen that contained 35 microg ethinyl estradiol/1 mg norethindrone. Subjects were randomized to receive 14 days of rifampin or rifabutin from days 7 through 21 of their menstrual cycle. After a 1-month washout period (only the oral contraceptives were taken), subjects were crossed over to the other rifamycin. RESULTS: Rifampin significantly decreased the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours [AUC(0-24)] of ethinyl estradiol and the mean AUC(0-24) of norethindrone. Rifabutin significantly decreased the mean AUC(0-24) of ethinyl estradiol and the mean AUC(0-24) of norethindrone. The effect of rifampin was significantly greater than rifabutin on each AUC(0-24). Despite these changes, subjects did not ovulate (as determined by progesterone concentrations) during the cycle in which either rifamycin was administered. Levels of mean follicle-stimulating hormone increased 69% after rifampin. CONCLUSION: In this study, rifampin (600 mg daily) was a more significant inducer of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone clearance than rifabutin (300 mg daily), but neither agent reversed the suppression of ovulation caused by oral contraceptives. The carefully monitored oral contraceptive administration and the limited exposure to rifamycins may restrict the application of this study to clinical situations. The relative effects of rifampin and rifabutin (a related rifamycin) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norethindrone were evaluated in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded crossover study in 12 premenopausal women who were on a stable oral contraceptive regimen that contained 35 mcg EE and 1 mg norethindrone. Subjects were randomized to receive 14 days of rifampin or rifabutin from days 7 through 21 of their menstrual cycle. After a 1-month washout period (only the oral contraceptives were taken), subjects were crossed over to the other rifamycin. Findings showed that rifampin significantly decreased the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours [AUC (0-24)] of EE and the mean AUC (0-24) of norethindrone. Rifabutin significantly decreased the mean AUC (0-24) of EE and the mean AUC (0-24) of norethindrone. The effect of rifampin was significantly greater than rifabutin on each AUC (0-24). Despite these changes, subjects did not ovulate (as determined by progesterone concentrations) during the cycle in which either rifamycin was administered. Levels of mean follicle-stimulating hormone increased 69% after rifampin. This study suggests that rifampin (600 mg daily) was a more important inducer of EE and norethindrone clearance than rifabutin, but none of these agents were able to reverse the suppression of ovulation done by oral contraceptives.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]