These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: A comparative physical evaluation of four X-ray films. Author: Egyed M, Shearer DR. Journal: Radiol Manage; 1981 Sep; 3(4):11-20. PubMed ID: 10253292. Abstract: In this study, four general purpose radiographic films (Agfa Gevaert Curix RP-1, duPont Cronex 4, Fuji RX, and Kodak XRP-1) were compared using three independent techniques. By examining the characteristic curves for the four films, film speed and contrast were compared over the diagnostically useful density range. These curves were generated using three methods: (1) irradiation of a standard film cassette lined with high-speed screens, covered by a twelve-step aluminum wedge; (2) direct exposure of film strips to an electro-luminescent sensitometer; and (3) direct irradiation of a standard film cassette lined with high-speed screens. The latter technique provided quantitative values for film speed and relative contrast. All three techniques provided virtually properly identical results and indicate that under properly controlled conditions simplified methods of film testing can give results equivalent to those obtained by more sophisticated techniques.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]