These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: The statistical case for elimination of the midwife: fact versus prejudice, 1890-1935 (Part I). Author: Devitt N. Journal: Women Health; 1979; 4(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 10297450. Abstract: The medical literature from 1890 to 1935 that examines the "midwife problem" in the United States is reviewed to evaluate the arguments of that period urging elimination of midwifery in the United States. Although many midwives at first delivered poor care, this was the result of efforts to deny them education and supervision. Due to physicians' poor training and philosophy of interference in birth, lay midwives delivered care as safe or safer than the average physician. Trained midwives delivered superb medical care and gave birthing women personal attention that physicians were too rushed to provide. It is suggested that the elimination of midwifery in the United States slowed the decline in infant and maternal mortality.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]