These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Chemotherapy versus radiotherapy versus observation for high-risk cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy: A randomized, prospective, multicenter trial.
    Author: Lahousen M, Haas J, Pickel H, Hackl A, Kurz C, Ogris H, Stummvoll W, Winter R.
    Journal: Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 10329034.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Adjuvant treatment modalities after radical hysterectomy have long been used in an attempt to eradicate microscopic tumor residuals in patients at high risk for recurrence. However, it has not been clearly demonstrated that adjuvant radiation, adjuvant chemotherapy, or both improve the outcome. To evaluate the effect of adjuvant treatment in patients with high-risk cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy, the Austrian Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial between 1989 and 1995. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients with stage IB-IIB cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node metastases and/or vascular invasion randomly received adjuvant chemotherapy (400 mg/m2 carboplatin, and 30 mg bleomycin), standardized external pelvic radiation therapy, or no further treatment. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 4.1 years (range, 2-7) there were no statistically significant differences (P = 0.9530) in disease-free survival among the three treatment arms. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation do not improve survival or recurrence rates in high-risk cervical cancer patients after radical hysterectomy. The most important treatment for these patients seems to be radical abdominal hysterectomy with systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]