These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A randomized, double-blind comparison of risedronate and etidronate in the treatment of Paget's disease of bone. Paget's Risedronate/Etidronate Study Group.
    Author: Miller PD, Brown JP, Siris ES, Hoseyni MS, Axelrod DW, Bekker PJ.
    Journal: Am J Med; 1999 May; 106(5):513-20. PubMed ID: 10335722.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of oral risedronate and etidronate for treatment of Paget's disease of bone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients from 12 centers in North America received risedronate 30 mg daily for 2 months (62 patients) or etidronate 400 mg daily for 6 months (61 patients) in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Serum alkaline phosphatase (the primary variable), serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and urinary deoxypyridinoline concentrations were monitored for 12 to 18 months. RESULTS: Serum alkaline phosphatase concentration normalized by month 12 in 73% of risedronate-treated patients, compared with 15% of those receiving etidronate (P <0.001). Median time to normalization was 91 days for risedronate-treated patients and >360 days for etidronate-treated patients (P <0.001); relapse rates were 3% in the risedronate group and 15% in the etidronate group (P <0.05). At month 18, 53% of the risedronate group and 14% of the etidronate group remained in biochemical remission. Urinary deoxypyridinoline normalized in 87% of patients on risedronate and 57% of patients receiving etidronate (P <0.01); serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase normalized in 73% of patients on risedronate and 18% of patients on etidronate (P <0.001). Patients who had received etidronate previously had a blunted response to etidronate, but not to risedronate. Reductions in pain were statistically significant in the risedronate group, but not in the etidronate group. Both drugs were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Although etidronate is effective, risedronate offers a shorter duration of therapy, better and longer-lasting remission, significant reductions in pain, and provides additional remission in subjects who exhibited an incomplete response to previous etidronate treatment.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]