These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of a continuous suture pattern with a simple interrupted pattern for enteric closure in dogs and cats: 83 cases (1991-1997).
    Author: Weisman DL, Smeak DD, Birchard SJ, Zweigart SL.
    Journal: J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1999 May 15; 214(10):1507-10. PubMed ID: 10340077.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare a simple continuous suture pattern with a simple interrupted pattern for enterotomy closure or end-to-end intestinal anastomosis. DESIGN: Retrospective study. ANIMALS: 58 dogs and 25 cats that underwent enterotomy or intestinal resection and anastomosis. PROCEDURE: Signalment, surgical procedure, suture pattern, suture material, confirmation of dehiscence, and follow-up were reviewed. Groups were compared by procedure (anastomosis or enterotomy) and by suture pattern. RESULTS: 57 animals underwent continuous closure; 26 had interrupted closure. Only polydioxanone or polypropylene suture materials were used. Overall, 81 (98%) animals had no signs of intestinal dehiscence and survived > 2 weeks. Two animals had confirmed dehiscence after foreign body removal, 1 of 57 (2%) after continuous closure, and 1 of 26 (4%) after interrupted closure. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The simple continuous closure pattern is an acceptable alternative to simple interrupted closure for small intestinal anastomosis or enterotomy closure.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]